Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG

AI-generated keywords: Retrieval-augmented generation Large language models External knowledge sources Hard negatives Optimization techniques

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Bowen Jin, Jinsung Yoon, Jiawei Han, and Sercan O. Arik focus on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge sources.
  • Study aims to optimize long-context LLM-based RAG systems for better performance in natural language processing tasks.
  • Increasing number of retrieved passages initially improves output quality but declines due to "hard negatives."
  • Proposed solutions include training-free techniques like retrieval reordering and training-based methods such as RAG-specific implicit LLM fine-tuning.
  • Training-based methods like RAG-oriented fine-tuning with intermediate reasoning show significant performance improvements.
  • Systematic analysis conducted on design choices including data distribution strategies, retriever selection criteria, and optimal training context length settings.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Bowen Jin, Jinsung Yoon, Jiawei Han, Sercan O. Arik

34 pages

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) empowers large language models (LLMs) to utilize external knowledge sources. The increasing capacity of LLMs to process longer input sequences opens up avenues for providing more retrieved information, to potentially enhance the quality of generated outputs. It is plausible to assume that a larger retrieval set would contain more relevant information (higher recall), that might result in improved performance. However, our empirical findings demonstrate that for many long-context LLMs, the quality of generated output initially improves first, but then subsequently declines as the number of retrieved passages increases. This paper investigates this phenomenon, identifying the detrimental impact of retrieved "hard negatives" as a key contributor. To mitigate this and enhance the robustness of long-context LLM-based RAG, we propose both training-free and training-based approaches. We first showcase the effectiveness of retrieval reordering as a simple yet powerful training-free optimization. Furthermore, we explore training-based methods, specifically RAG-specific implicit LLM fine-tuning and RAG-oriented fine-tuning with intermediate reasoning, demonstrating their capacity for substantial performance gains. Finally, we conduct a systematic analysis of design choices for these training-based methods, including data distribution, retriever selection, and training context length.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.05983v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG," authors Bowen Jin, Jinsung Yoon, Jiawei Han, and Sercan O. Arik delve into the realm of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and its application in empowering large language models (LLMs) to leverage external knowledge sources. The study focuses on optimizing long-context LLM-based RAG systems for improved performance outcomes in natural language processing tasks. With the increasing capability of LLMs to process longer input sequences, there is a growing potential to provide more retrieved information that could enhance the quality of generated outputs. However, empirical findings presented in the study reveal a nuanced trend where an increased number of retrieved passages initially improves the quality of generated output but subsequently declines as this number continues to rise. This is attributed to the detrimental impact of retrieved "hard negatives" on overall performance. To address this challenge and bolster the robustness of long-context LLM-based RAG systems, the authors propose a range of both training-free and training-based approaches. One such approach highlighted in the paper is retrieval reordering, which serves as a simple yet potent training-free optimization technique. Additionally, the study explores training-based methods tailored specifically for RAG applications including RAG-specific implicit LLM fine-tuning and RAG-oriented fine-tuning with intermediate reasoning. These methods are shown to offer significant performance gains. Furthermore, a systematic analysis is conducted on various design choices associated with these training-based methods such as data distribution strategies, retriever selection criteria, and optimal training context length settings. By delving into these aspects and proposing novel solutions to mitigate challenges posed by retrieved "hard negatives," the authors provide valuable insights into optimizing long-context LLM-based RAG systems for improved performance outcomes in natural language processing tasks.
Created on 12 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.