LongRAG: A Dual-Perspective Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigm for Long-Context Question Answering

AI-generated keywords: Long-Context Question Answering

AI-generated Key Points

  • Long-Context Question Answering (LCQA) is a challenging task requiring reasoning over long-context documents for accurate answers.
  • Existing long-context Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with the "lost in the middle" issue, making it hard to extract relevant information from lengthy documents.
  • LongRAG is proposed as a general, dual-perspective, and robust LLM-based RAG system paradigm for LCQA to enhance understanding of complex long-context knowledge by considering global information and factual details.
  • LongRAG outperforms existing long-context LLMs, advanced RAG systems, and Vanilla RAG significantly in experiments on multi-hop datasets.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Qingfei Zhao, Ruobing Wang, Yukuo Cen, Daren Zha, Shicheng Tan, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang

EMNLP 2024 Main, Final
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Long-Context Question Answering (LCQA), a challenging task, aims to reason over long-context documents to yield accurate answers to questions. Existing long-context Large Language Models (LLMs) for LCQA often struggle with the "lost in the middle" issue. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates this issue by providing external factual evidence. However, its chunking strategy disrupts the global long-context information, and its low-quality retrieval in long contexts hinders LLMs from identifying effective factual details due to substantial noise. To this end, we propose LongRAG, a general, dual-perspective, and robust LLM-based RAG system paradigm for LCQA to enhance RAG's understanding of complex long-context knowledge (i.e., global information and factual details). We design LongRAG as a plug-and-play paradigm, facilitating adaptation to various domains and LLMs. Extensive experiments on three multi-hop datasets demonstrate that LongRAG significantly outperforms long-context LLMs (up by 6.94%), advanced RAG (up by 6.16%), and Vanilla RAG (up by 17.25%). Furthermore, we conduct quantitative ablation studies and multi-dimensional analyses, highlighting the effectiveness of the system's components and fine-tuning strategies. Data and code are available at https://github.com/QingFei1/LongRAG.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.18050v2

, , , , Long-Context Question Answering (LCQA) is a challenging task that requires reasoning over long-context documents to provide accurate answers to questions. Existing long-context Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with the "lost in the middle" issue, where they have difficulty extracting relevant information from lengthy documents. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been introduced to address this issue by incorporating external factual evidence. However, RAG's chunking strategy can disrupt the global long-context information, and its low-quality retrieval in long contexts leads to noise that hinders LLMs from identifying effective factual details. To overcome these challenges, LongRAG is proposed as a general, dual-perspective, and robust LLM-based RAG system paradigm for LCQA. It aims to enhance RAG's understanding of complex long-context knowledge by considering both global information and factual details. <ins><b><u>Description:</u></b></ins> LongRAG is designed as a plug-and-play paradigm that can be easily adapted to different domains and LLMs. Extensive experiments on three multi-hop datasets show that LongRAG outperforms existing long-context LLMs, advanced RAG systems, and Vanilla RAG significantly. The limitations of Vanilla RAG are highlighted due to its disruption of contextual structure and background information in long documents, as well as low evidence density leading to inaccurate responses. <ins><b><u>Limitations of Existing Methods:</u></b></ins> Advanced RAG systems like Self-RAG and CRAG attempt to address these issues but have their own limitations. In contrast, LongRAG comprises four plug-and-play components with multiple strategies: a hybrid retriever, an LLM-augmented information extractor, a CoT-guided filter, and an LLM-augmented generator. The key innovation of LongRAG lies in its ability to mine global long-context information effectively while identifying factual details accurately. <ins><b><u>Innovative Strategies:</u></b></ins> The system employs a mapping strategy for orderly extending the semantic space of retrieved chunks into a higher dimensional long-context semantic space. Additionally, the CoT-guided filter provides global clues based on all retrieved chunks' knowledge to help filter out irrelevant information. Furthermore, LongRAG includes an automated instruction data pipeline for constructing high-quality datasets for fine-tuning purposes. This fine-tuning strategy enhances the system's core components' "instruction-following" capabilities and facilitates easy transferability to other domains. <ins><b><u>Key Takeaways:</u></b></ins> Extensive multi-dimensional experiments demonstrate the superiority of LongRAG over existing methods across various LLMs and highlight the effectiveness of its components and fine-tuning strategy in enhancing LCQA performance.
Created on 12 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.