Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2411.05059v2

In the rapidly evolving field of large language models (LLMs), there is a growing interest in fine-tuning these models to incorporate new information and update existing knowledge. While commercial LLM fine-tuning APIs offered by prominent providers like OpenAI and Google hold the promise of versatile adaptation for a wide range of applications, the effectiveness of this fine-tuning process has remained uncertain. To address this gap, a team of researchers led by Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, and James Zou have developed FineTuneBench - an innovative evaluation framework and dataset aimed at assessing how well commercial fine-tuning APIs can successfully integrate new and updated knowledge into LLMs. The study conducted by the researchers focused on analyzing five cutting-edge LLMs that are equipped with commercially available fine-tuning APIs, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro. The evaluation was carried out in two key settings: firstly, evaluating the models' ability to absorb novel information such as recent news events and new people profiles; and secondly, assessing their performance in updating existing knowledge like incorporating updated medical guidelines and code frameworks. The results obtained from the study shed light on significant shortcomings in all the models' capacity to effectively learn new information through fine-tuning, with an average generalization accuracy of only 37% across all models. Moreover, when it came to updating existing knowledge such as integrating medical guideline updates, the commercial fine-tuning APIs exhibited even more limited capabilities with an average generalization accuracy of just 19%. Among the models evaluated, it was found that fine-tuning GPT-4o mini displayed the highest efficacy in infusing new knowledge and updating existing knowledge, followed closely by GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4o. On the other hand, the fine-tuning APIs for Gemini 1.5 Flesh and Gemini 1.5 Pro were unable to effectively learn new knowledge or update existing knowledge. These findings underscore a significant challenge in utilizing current commercial fine-tuning services to achieve reliable infusion of knowledge in common scenarios within LLMs. As a contribution to further research in this area, the researchers have made the FineTuneBench dataset openly accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/kevinwu23/StanfordFineTuneBench. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the limitations of current commercial fine-tuning APIs for enhancing LLMs with new information and updated knowledge, highlighting areas for improvement in future developments within this domain.

• - Rapidly evolving field of large language models (LLMs)
• - Growing interest in fine-tuning LLMs to incorporate new information and update existing knowledge
• - Commercial LLM fine-tuning APIs by providers like OpenAI and Google offer versatile adaptation but effectiveness remains uncertain
• - Researchers led by Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, and James Zou developed FineTuneBench evaluation framework for assessing commercial fine-tuning APIs
• - Study focused on analyzing five cutting-edge LLMs with commercially available fine-tuning APIs, including GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro
• - Evaluation conducted in two key settings: absorbing novel information and updating existing knowledge
• - Results showed significant shortcomings in models' capacity to learn new information through fine-tuning, with average generalization accuracy of 37%
• - Limited capabilities of commercial fine-tuning APIs in updating existing knowledge, with average generalization accuracy of 19%
• - GPT-4o mini displayed highest efficacy in infusing new knowledge and updating existing knowledge, followed by GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4o
• - Gemini 1.5 Flesh and Gemini 1.5 Pro fine-tuning APIs were ineffective in learning new knowledge or updating existing knowledge
• - Challenge in utilizing current commercial fine-tuning services for reliable infusion of knowledge within LLMs
• - FineTuneBench dataset made openly accessible on GitHub for further research

Summary- People are making big computer programs that can understand and use language better. They want to make these programs even smarter by teaching them new things and updating what they already know. - Some companies like OpenAI and Google have tools that help make these programs better, but we're not sure how well they work yet. - Some smart people made a way to test how good these tools are at making the programs smarter. - They looked at five different super-smart programs and found that some were good at learning new things, while others weren't so good. - It's hard to use the current tools to teach these programs new things reliably. Definitions- Rapidly evolving field of large language models (LLMs): Quickly changing area of making big computer programs that understand language well. - Fine-tuning: Teaching a program new things or updating what it already knows to make it smarter. - APIs: Tools provided by companies like OpenAI and Google to help improve these smart computer programs. - Evaluation framework: A way created by smart people to check how well the tools from companies work in making the computer programs smarter. - Generalization accuracy: How well a program can learn new things or update what it knows accurately.

The field of large language models (LLMs) is rapidly evolving, with a growing interest in fine-tuning these models to incorporate new information and update existing knowledge. This has led to the development of commercial LLM fine-tuning APIs offered by prominent providers such as OpenAI and Google. However, the effectiveness of this fine-tuning process has remained uncertain. To address this gap, a team of researchers led by Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, and James Zou have developed FineTuneBench - an innovative evaluation framework and dataset aimed at assessing how well commercial fine-tuning APIs can successfully integrate new and updated knowledge into LLMs. The study conducted by the researchers focused on analyzing five cutting-edge LLMs that are equipped with commercially available fine-tuning APIs: GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4o mini, and Gemini 1.5 Flesh. The evaluation was carried out in two key settings: evaluating the models' ability to absorb novel information such as recent news events and new people profiles; and assessing their performance in updating existing knowledge like incorporating updated medical guidelines and code frameworks. The results obtained from the study shed light on significant shortcomings in all the models' capacity to effectively learn new information through fine-tuning, with an average generalization accuracy of only 37% across all models. This means that even with access to state-of-the-art LLMs equipped with commercial fine-tuning APIs, there are limitations when it comes to integrating new knowledge into these systems. Moreover, when it came to updating existing knowledge such as incorporating medical guideline updates or code frameworks changes, the commercial fine-tuning APIs exhibited even more limited capabilities with an average generalization accuracy of just 19%. This highlights a significant challenge in utilizing current commercial fine-tuning services for reliable infusion of knowledge into common scenarios within LLMs. Among the models evaluated, it was found that fine-tuning GPT-4o mini displayed the highest efficacy in infusing new knowledge and updating existing knowledge, followed closely by GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4o. On the other hand, the fine-tuning APIs for Gemini 1.5 Flesh and Gemini 1.5 Pro were unable to effectively learn new knowledge or update existing knowledge. These findings underscore the need for further research in this area to improve the capabilities of commercial fine-tuning APIs for enhancing LLMs with new information and updated knowledge. As a contribution to this effort, the researchers have made the FineTuneBench dataset openly accessible on GitHub at https://github.com/kevinwu23/StanfordFineTuneBench. The FineTuneBench dataset includes a wide range of tasks designed to evaluate how well LLMs can integrate new information and update existing knowledge through fine-tuning. This includes tasks such as news event prediction, people profile completion, medical guideline incorporation, code framework updates, and more. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the limitations of current commercial fine-tuning APIs for enhancing LLMs with new information and updated knowledge. It highlights areas for improvement in future developments within this domain and emphasizes the importance of continued research in this rapidly evolving field. With access to datasets like FineTuneBench, researchers can continue to push boundaries and develop more effective methods for incorporating new information into LLMs through fine-tuning.