Cosmology From CMB Lensing and Delensed EE Power Spectra Using 2019-2020 SPT-3G Polarization Data

AI-generated keywords: CMB polarization

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Researchers utilized CMB polarization data to reconstruct the CMB lensing power spectrum and the unlensed E-mode power spectrum
Observations were conducted in 2019 and 2020 using the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and SPT-3G camera
Data covered 1500 deg$^2$ at frequencies of 95, 150, and 220 GHz with high arcminute resolution
Precise estimates of the E-mode spectrum at $\ell>2000$ and the lensing spectrum at $L>350$ were obtained through Bayesian analysis using the MUSE method
Determined a value of $H_0=66.81\pm0.81$ km/s/Mpc from SPT data alone, showing a significant tension with measurements from the distance ladder
Found $S_8=0.850\pm0.017$, indicating further evidence of a discrepancy with low-redshift structure probes
Confirmed that the $\Lambda$CDM model provided an excellent fit to combined datasets from Planck, ACT, and SPT
Established a 95% confidence upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses at 0.075 eV

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: F. Ge, M. Millea, E. Camphuis, C. Daley, N. Huang, Y. Omori, W. Quan, E. Anderes, A. J. Anderson, B. Ansarinejad, M. Archipley, L. Balkenhol, K. Benabed, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, F. R. Bouchet, L. Bryant, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, G. Chen, P. M. Chichura, A. Chokshi, T. -L. Chou, A. Coerver, T. M. Crawford, T. de Haan, K. R. Dibert, M. A. Dobbs, M. Doohan, A. Doussot, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, C. Feng, K. R. Ferguson, K. Fichman, A. Foster, S. Galli, A. E. Gambrel, R. W. Gardner, N. Goeckner-Wald, R. Gualtieri, F. Guidi, S. Guns, N. W. Halverson, E. Hivon, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. C. Hood, D. Howe, A. Hryciuk, F. Kéruzoré, A. R. Khalife, L. Knox, M. Korman, K. Kornoelje, C. -L. Kuo, A. T. Lee, K. Levy, A. E. Lowitz, C. Lu, A. Maniyar, E. S. Martsen, F. Menanteau, J. Montgomery, Y. Nakato, T. Natoli, G. I. Noble, Z. Pan, P. Paschos, K. A. Phadke, A. W. Pollak, K. Prabhu, M. Rahimi, A. Rahlin, C. L. Reichardt, D. Riebel, M. Rouble, J. E. Ruhl, E. Schiappucci, J. A. Sobrin, A. A. Stark, J. Stephen, C. Tandoi, B. Thorne, C. Trendafilova, C. Umilta, J. D. Vieira, A. Vitrier, Y. Wan, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, M. R. Young, J. A. Zebrowski

arXiv: 2411.06000v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)

28 pages, 21 figures + appendices

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: From CMB polarization data alone we reconstruct the CMB lensing power spectrum, comparable in overall constraining power to previous temperature-based reconstructions, and an unlensed E-mode power spectrum. The observations, taken in 2019 and 2020 with the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and the SPT-3G camera, cover 1500 deg$^2$ at 95, 150, and 220 GHz with arcminute resolution and roughly 4.9$\mu$K-arcmin coadded noise in polarization. The power spectrum estimates, together with systematic parameter estimates and a joint covariance matrix, follow from a Bayesian analysis using the Marginal Unbiased Score Expansion (MUSE) method. The E-mode spectrum at $\ell>2000$ and lensing spectrum at $L>350$ are the most precise to date. Assuming the $\Lambda$CDM model, and using only these SPT data and priors on $\tau$ and absolute calibration from Planck, we find $H_0=66.81\pm0.81$ km/s/Mpc, comparable in precision to the Planck determination and in 5.4$\sigma$ tension with the most precise $H_0$ inference derived via the distance ladder. We also find $S_8=0.850\pm0.017$, providing further independent evidence of a slight tension with low-redshift structure probes. The $\Lambda$CDM model provides a good simultaneous fit to the combined Planck, ACT, and SPT data, and thus passes a powerful test. Combining these CMB datasets with BAO observations, we find that the effective number of neutrino species, spatial curvature, and primordial helium fraction are consistent with standard model values, and that the 95% confidence upper limit on the neutrino mass sum is 0.075 eV. The SPT data are consistent with the somewhat weak preference for excess lensing power seen in Planck and ACT data relative to predictions of the $\Lambda$CDM model. We also detect at greater than 3$\sigma$ the influence of non-linear evolution in the CMB lensing power spectrum and discuss it in the context of the $S_8$ tension.(abridged)

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Nov. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2411.06000v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

, , , , In a recent study, researchers utilized CMB polarization data to reconstruct the CMB lensing power spectrum and the unlensed E-mode power spectrum. The observations were conducted in 2019 and 2020 using the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and the SPT-3G camera, covering 1500 deg$^2$ at frequencies of 95, 150, and 220 GHz with high arcminute resolution. The data had a coadded noise level of approximately 4.9$\mu$K-arcmin in polarization. Through a Bayesian analysis employing the Marginal Unbiased Score Expansion (MUSE) method, the researchers obtained precise estimates of the E-mode spectrum at $\ell>2000$ and the lensing spectrum at $L>350$, currently among the most accurate to date. In a recent study, researchers utilized CMB polarization data to reconstruct the CMB lensing power spectrum and the unlensed E-mode power spectrum. Researchers used CMB polarization data to reconstruct this spectrum with high precision. Assuming the $\Lambda$CDM model and incorporating priors on parameters such as $\tau$ and absolute calibration from Planck, they determined a value of $H_0=66.81\pm0.81$ km/s/Mpc from the SPT data alone. This result is comparable in precision to previous determinations by Planck but shows a significant tension of 5.4$\sigma$ with measurements derived from the distance ladder. A Bayesian analysis using this method provided precise estimates of the E-mode and lensing spectra. The researchers found a significant tension of 5.4$\sigma$ between their determination of $H_0$ and measurements from the distance ladder. Additionally, they found $S_8=0.850\pm0.017$, indicating further evidence of a slight discrepancy with low-redshift structure probes. The researchers confirmed that the $\Lambda$CDM model provided an excellent fit to combined datasets from Planck, ACT, and SPT, passing rigorous testing criteria. By combining their CMB datasets with observations from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), they determined that parameters such as effective number of neutrino species, spatial curvature, primordial helium fraction were consistent with standard model values. Moreover, they established a 95% confidence upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses at 0.075 eV. The study detected these effects in the CMB lensing power spectrum at greater than 3$\sigma$, shedding light on discrepancies related to $S_8$. Overall, these findings contribute valuable insights into cosmological models and highlight areas where further investigation is warranted for resolving tensions within current observational constraints.

- Researchers utilized CMB polarization data to reconstruct the CMB lensing power spectrum and the unlensed E-mode power spectrum
- Observations were conducted in 2019 and 2020 using the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and SPT-3G camera
- Data covered 1500 deg$^2$ at frequencies of 95, 150, and 220 GHz with high arcminute resolution
- Precise estimates of the E-mode spectrum at $\ell>2000$ and the lensing spectrum at $L>350$ were obtained through Bayesian analysis using the MUSE method
- Determined a value of $H_0=66.81\pm0.81$ km/s/Mpc from SPT data alone, showing a significant tension with measurements from the distance ladder
- Found $S_8=0.850\pm0.017$, indicating further evidence of a discrepancy with low-redshift structure probes
- Confirmed that the $\Lambda$CDM model provided an excellent fit to combined datasets from Planck, ACT, and SPT
- Established a 95% confidence upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses at 0.075 eV

SummaryResearchers used information from the sky to learn more about space. They took pictures using a special telescope and camera at the South Pole in 2019 and 2020. The pictures covered a large area and showed different colors of light. By studying these pictures closely, they found out how fast things are moving in space and discovered some interesting things about tiny particles called neutrinos. Definitions- Researchers: People who study and learn new things. - CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background): Light left over from the Big Bang that fills the universe. - Polarization: A property of light waves that describes how they vibrate in different directions. - Spectrum: Range of colors or frequencies present in light. - Bayesian analysis: A statistical method for making predictions based on data and prior knowledge. - MUSE method: A specific technique used for analyzing data. - $H_0$: Hubble constant, a measure of how fast the universe is expanding. - S8: A number describing how galaxies are distributed in space. - $\Lambda$CDM model: A theory describing the composition and evolution of the universe. - Neutrino: Tiny, nearly massless particles that travel close to the speed of light.

Introduction

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is a relic radiation from the early universe, providing valuable insights into the fundamental properties of our universe. In particular, CMB polarization data has been used to reconstruct the CMB lensing power spectrum and the unlensed E-mode power spectrum with high precision. This research paper presents new findings from a Bayesian analysis using Marginal Unbiased Score Expansion (MUSE) method on recent observations conducted by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and SPT-3G camera.

The Data

The observations were conducted in 2019 and 2020, covering 1500 deg$^2$ at frequencies of 95, 150, and 220 GHz with high arcminute resolution. The data had a coadded noise level of approximately 4.9$\mu$K-arcmin in polarization. These measurements are currently among the most accurate to date.

Methodology

The researchers utilized a Bayesian analysis approach incorporating priors on parameters such as $\tau$ and absolute calibration from Planck to determine precise estimates of the E-mode spectrum at $\ell>2000$ and the lensing spectrum at $L>350$. They assumed the standard cosmological model ($\Lambda$CDM) for their analysis.

Main Findings

From their analysis, they obtained a value of $H_0=66.81\pm0.81$ km/s/Mpc from SPT data alone, which is comparable in precision to previous determinations by Planck but shows a significant tension of 5.4$\sigma$ with measurements derived from the distance ladder. This result highlights potential discrepancies between different methods for determining this important cosmological parameter. Moreover, they found $S_8=0.850\pm0.017$, indicating further evidence of a slight discrepancy with low-redshift structure probes. This finding is consistent with previous studies and adds to the growing body of evidence for potential tensions within the standard cosmological model.

Model Testing

To ensure the validity of their results, the researchers tested their findings against combined datasets from Planck, Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), and SPT. They found that the $\Lambda$CDM model provided an excellent fit to these data sets, passing rigorous testing criteria.

Implications and Future Directions

The study also has implications for other parameters in the standard cosmological model. By combining their CMB datasets with observations from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), they determined that parameters such as effective number of neutrino species, spatial curvature, primordial helium fraction were consistent with standard model values. Additionally, they established a 95% confidence upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses at 0.075 eV. Furthermore, this research sheds light on discrepancies related to $S_8$, which could potentially be resolved by further investigation into low-redshift structure probes or modifications to the standard cosmological model.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study presents new insights into our understanding of fundamental properties of our universe through precise measurements of CMB polarization data using advanced Bayesian analysis techniques. The results highlight potential tensions within current observational constraints and provide valuable directions for future research in resolving these discrepancies. Overall, this research contributes significantly to our knowledge about cosmological models and opens up avenues for further investigation in this field.

Created on 14 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

66.6%

Constraining Cosmology With the CMB $\times$ LIM-Nulling Convergence

astro-ph.CO

66.5%

TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hub…

astro-ph.CO

66.2%

The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results With ~1500 New High-redshift Type I…

astro-ph.CO

66.2%

Exploration of the polarization angle variability of the Crab Nebula with POL…

astro-ph.CO

65.7%

Galaxy cluster strong lensing cosmography: cosmological constraints from a sa…

astro-ph.CO

65.7%

Cosmoglobe DR1. III. First full-sky model of polarized synchrotron emission f…

astro-ph.CO

65.4%

Cosmology with Strong Lensing Systems

astro-ph.CO

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.