Financial News-Driven LLM Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio Management

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning Sentiment Analysis Financial Trading Dynamic Strategy Optimization Qualitative Market Signals

AI-generated Key Points

  • Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful tool in financial trading for dynamic strategy optimization.
  • Ananya Unnikrishnan's study integrates sentiment analysis from large language models (LLMs) into RL frameworks to enhance trading performance.
  • Experiments focused on single-stock trading with Apple Inc. (AAPL) and portfolio trading with the ING Corporate Leaders Trust Series B (LEXCX).
  • Sentiment-enhanced RL models outperformed those without sentiment, showing superior net worth and cumulative profit.
  • In the portfolio experiment, the sentiment-enhanced RL model even outperformed the actual LEXCX portfolio's buy-and-hold strategy.
  • Incorporating qualitative market signals into decision-making processes in financial trading can lead to significant benefits.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ananya Unnikrishnan

arXiv: 2411.11059v1 - DOI (q-fin.CP)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a transformative approach for financial trading, enabling dynamic strategy optimization in complex markets. This study explores the integration of sentiment analysis, derived from large language models (LLMs), into RL frameworks to enhance trading performance. Experiments were conducted on single-stock trading with Apple Inc. (AAPL) and portfolio trading with the ING Corporate Leaders Trust Series B (LEXCX). The sentiment-enhanced RL models demonstrated superior net worth and cumulative profit compared to RL models without sentiment and, in the portfolio experiment, outperformed the actual LEXCX portfolio's buy-and-hold strategy. These results highlight the potential of incorporating qualitative market signals to improve decision-making, bridging the gap between quantitative and qualitative approaches in financial trading.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Nov. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2411.11059v1

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool in financial trading, allowing for dynamic strategy optimization in complex markets. This study by Ananya Unnikrishnan explores the integration of sentiment analysis from large language models (LLMs) into RL frameworks to enhance trading performance. The experiments conducted focused on single-stock trading with Apple Inc. (AAPL) and portfolio trading with the ING Corporate Leaders Trust Series B (LEXCX). The results of the study showed that sentiment-enhanced RL models outperformed RL models without sentiment, demonstrating superior net worth and cumulative profit. In the portfolio experiment, the sentiment-enhanced RL model even outperformed the actual LEXCX portfolio's buy-and-hold strategy. These findings highlight the potential benefits of incorporating qualitative market signals into decision-making processes in financial trading. algorithms have gained popularity in due to their ability to adapt and optimize strategies based on sequential decisions. Unlike traditional rule-based systems, can navigate complex market environments and continuously update strategies to maximize returns. However, while data-driven decisions are effective, often lack access to that could further enhance decision-making processes. By integrating sentiment analysis derived from LLMs into RL frameworks, this study demonstrates how can improve decision-making in financial trading. This bridge between quantitative and qualitative approaches shows promise for enhancing overall trading performance and optimizing strategies in dynamic market conditions.
Created on 21 Dec. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.