LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview

Authors: Chongyang Tao, Tao Shen, Shen Gao, Junshuo Zhang, Zhen Li, Zhengwei Tao, Shuai Ma

32 pages
License: CC BY 4.0
AI-generated keywords: Large language models embedding models direct prompting data-centric tuning limitations and challenges

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing with exceptional performance across tasks.
  • Shift towards decoder-only LLMs like GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral for embedding models.
  • Two primary strategies for deriving embeddings: direct prompting and data-centric tuning.
  • Direct prompting involves prompt designs and rationale for competitive embeddings.
  • Data-centric tuning covers model architecture, training objectives, and data constructions influencing embedding tuning.
  • Challenges addressed include handling longer texts, multilingual/cross-modal data, performance/efficiency trade-offs, dense vs sparse embeddings, pooling strategies, scaling laws.
  • Adaptation challenges of LLMs for embeddings: cross-task quality issues, efficiency vs accuracy trade-offs, low-resource scenarios, long-context considerations, data biases, robustness concerns.
  • Extension of context in LLM embedding models through plug-and-play methods to address high computational costs associated with fine-tuning LLMs (e.g., chunking-free architecture proposed by Luo et al.).
  • Survey serves as a valuable resource synthesizing advancements in LLMs as embedding models and highlights key challenges for future work in enhancing their effectiveness and efficiency within NLP tasks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing by achieving state-of-the-art performance across various tasks. Recently, their effectiveness as embedding models has gained attention, marking a paradigm shift from traditional encoder-only models like ELMo and BERT to decoder-only, large-scale LLMs such as GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral. This survey provides an in-depth overview of this transition, beginning with foundational techniques before the LLM era, followed by LLM-based embedding models through two main strategies to derive embeddings from LLMs. 1) Direct prompting: We mainly discuss the prompt designs and the underlying rationale for deriving competitive embeddings. 2) Data-centric tuning: We cover extensive aspects that affect tuning an embedding model, including model architecture, training objectives, data constructions, etc. Upon the above, we also cover advanced methods, such as handling longer texts, and multilingual and cross-modal data. Furthermore, we discuss factors affecting choices of embedding models, such as performance/efficiency comparisons, dense vs sparse embeddings, pooling strategies, and scaling law. Lastly, the survey highlights the limitations and challenges in adapting LLMs for embeddings, including cross-task embedding quality, trade-offs between efficiency and accuracy, low-resource, long-context, data bias, robustness, etc. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners by synthesizing current advancements, highlighting key challenges, and offering a comprehensive framework for future work aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of LLMs as embedding models.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Dec. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2412.12591v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed natural language processing by achieving exceptional performance across various tasks. Recently, there has been a shift towards recognizing their effectiveness as embedding models, moving away from traditional encoder-only models like ELMo and BERT to decoder-only, large-scale LLMs such as GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral. This comprehensive survey delves into this transition and explores two primary strategies for deriving embeddings: direct prompting and data-centric tuning. were first discussed before diving into the details of LLM-based embedding models. Direct prompting involves discussing prompt designs and the rationale behind generating competitive embeddings. On the other hand, data-centric tuning covers various aspects influencing the tuning of an embedding model, including model architecture, training objectives, and data constructions. Additionally,, such as handling longer texts and multilingual/cross-modal data are explored in detail. The survey also examines factors impacting the selection of embedding models such as performance/efficiency trade-offs, dense vs sparse embeddings, pooling strategies, and scaling laws. Furthermore,in adapting LLMs for embeddings are highlighted. These include cross-task embedding quality issues, balancing efficiency with accuracy trade-offs, low-resource scenarios, long-context considerations, data biases,and robustness concerns. Moreover,have focused on extending the context of LLM embedding models through plug-and-play methods to address high computational costs associated with fine-tuning LLMs. For instance,Luo et al. (2024a) proposed a chunking-free architecture to handle long contexts effectively. In conclusion,this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners by synthesizing current advancements in LLMs as embedding models while shedding light on key challenges. It offers a comprehensive framework for future work aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of LLMs in their role as embedding models within natural language processing tasks.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.