AI summary · arXiv: 2412.16241v1 · cs.AI
Agents Are Not Enough
The essentials
- Agents in AI are autonomous programs that operate on behalf of humans and have gained renewed attention due to their integration into society.
- Authors Chirag Shah and Ryen W. White conduct a retrospective analysis by examining past iterations of agents to identify successful and unsuccessful aspects.
- The current focus on agents includes a strong emphasis on an ecosystem approach, which involves Sims (representations of user preferences) and Assistants (facilitate task execution by coordinating with agents).
- Shah and White argue that relying solely on generative AI technology is insufficient for ensuring the success of agents, proposing a comprehensive ecosystem approach that maximizes the potential impact of AI-driven technologies.
Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
How to chat with this paper? Illustrated guide
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Keep this conversation — a free account saves your questions and answers, your collections of papers and your alerts.
Continue with Google Create a free accountTools for this paper
Advanced tools Premium
For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium
Papers around this one
See them on a mapRanked by how close their title and abstract are to this paper’s. Select some to read them together.
Closest papers
-
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and ChallengesRanjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Manoj Karkee · 2025 · Information Fusion, 2025 · cited 635 times · AI summary available
Abstract
This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. We begin by outlining the search strategy and foundational definitions, characterizing AI Agents as modular systems driven and enabled by LLMs and LIMs for task-specific automation. Generative AI is positioned as a precursor providing the foundation, with AI agents advancing through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. We then characterize Agentic AI systems, which, in contrast to AI Agents, represent a paradigm shift mar…
-
Agents Through the AgesDaksitha Senel Withanage Don, Elisabeth André, Michael Dietz et al. · 2026 · KI - Künstliche Intelligenz · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Over several decades, research on socially interactive agents has transformed human–machine interaction, evolving from early script-based systems to today’s generative, multimodal agents. Tracing this development through the ages, this article reflects on major conceptual and technical shifts that shaped the field, drawing on advances across multiple areas of AI, and discusses how progress in natural language processing and multimodal behavior analysis and generation has redefined AI as a social interface. Rather than presenting this trajectory as a narrative of continuous progress, we also examine persistent limitations, including weak grounding, difficult evaluation, opaque decision proces…
-
Agentic AI and Multiagentic: Are We Reinventing the Wheel?V. Botti · 2025 · Multiagent Systems · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 16 times · AI summary available
Abstract
The terms Agentic AI and Multiagentic AI have recently gained popularity in discussions on generative artificial intelligence, often used to describe autonomous software agents and systems composed of such agents. However, the use of these terms confuses these buzzwords with well-established concepts in AI literature: intelligent agents and multi-agent systems. This article offers a critical analysis of this conceptual misuse. We review the theoretical origins of "agentic" in the social sciences (Bandura, 1986) and philosophical notions of intentionality (Dennett, 1971), and then summarise foundational works on intelligent agents and multi-agent systems by Wooldridge, Jennings and others. We…
-
Design Principles for Human-Agent InteractionHai-Yi Zhu, Can-Wen Wang, Qing Xiao et al. · 2026 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · Not summarized yet
Abstract
AI agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous systems capable of sustained interaction, tool use, and long-term collaboration. Yet their real-world adoption remains limited, suggesting that the key barrier lies not only in technical capability but also in a lack of design knowledge for successful human-agent interaction. This position paper argues that AI agents should not be solely evaluated or deployed based on autonomous task capability alone; because agents interact with, adapt to, influence, and sometimes fail humans, human-agent interaction must be treated as a core design and evaluation target for agentic AI. We present 14 design principles that articulate the ideal human-agent relat…
-
Generative AI, AI Agents, and Agentic AI : An Overview of Current AI TechnologiesUrmila R. Pol · 2025 · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
This research paper examines the transformation of Artificial Intelligence from rule-based systems to three advanced paradigms: Generative AI, AI Agents, and Agentic AI. Generative AI focuses on creating original content by learning from large datasets, serving as reactive tools that respond to user prompts. AI Agents execute goal-driven tasks autonomously within specific environments by perceiving inputs and making decisions in real time. Agentic AI advances this further by proactively planning, reasoning, and managing multi-step workflows with minimal human oversight, enabling dynamic task execution and long-term goal achievement. The study highlights how these AI forms differ in autonomy,…
-
Agentic AI Frameworks Under the Microscope: What Works, What Doesn’tKarthik Vaidhyanathan, Davide Taibi · 2026 · IEEE Software · cited 6 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
AI agents are rapidly transforming the software engineering landscape, supported by a wave of new frameworks. Our review of the 10 most representative general-purpose agentic AI frameworks reveals a maturing but fragmented landscape. While some frameworks provide enterprise-ready capabilities, most remain immature, with limited memory models, basic reasoning, and uneven ecosystem support. Significant improvements are needed before these frameworks can enable reliable and large-scale adoption in practice.—Davide Taibi
-
Demystifying AI Agents: The Final Generation of IntelligenceKevin J McNamara, Rhea Pritham Marpu · 2025 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The trajectory of artificial intelligence (AI) has been one of relentless acceleration, evolving from rudimentary rule-based systems to sophisticated, autonomous agents capable of complex reasoning and interaction. This whitepaper chronicles this remarkable journey, charting the key technological milestones--advancements in prompting, training methodologies, hardware capabilities, and architectural innovations--that have converged to create the AI agents of today. We argue that these agents, exemplified by systems like OpenAI's ChatGPT with plugins and xAI's Grok, represent a culminating phase in AI development, potentially constituting the"final generation"of intelligence as we currently co…
-
AI Agents That MatterSayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Zachary S. Siegel et al. · 2024 · Machine Learning · cited 288 times · AI summary available
Abstract
AI agents are an exciting new research direction, and agent development is driven by benchmarks. Our analysis of current agent benchmarks and evaluation practices reveals several shortcomings that hinder their usefulness in real-world applications. First, there is a narrow focus on accuracy without attention to other metrics. As a result, SOTA agents are needlessly complex and costly, and the community has reached mistaken conclusions about the sources of accuracy gains. Our focus on cost in addition to accuracy motivates the new goal of jointly optimizing the two metrics. We design and implement one such optimization, showing its potential to greatly reduce cost while maintaining accuracy. …
Prior work it builds on
-
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A SurveyTula Masterman, Sandi Besen, Mason Sawtell et al. · 2024 · Artificial Intelligence · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 270 times · AI summary available
Abstract
This survey paper examines the recent advancements in AI agent implementations, with a focus on their ability to achieve complex goals that require enhanced reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities. The primary objectives of this work are to a) communicate the current capabilities and limitations of existing AI agent implementations, b) share insights gained from our observations of these systems in action, and c) suggest important considerations for future developments in AI agent design. We achieve this by providing overviews of single-agent and multi-agent architectures, identifying key patterns and divergences in design choices, and evaluating their overall impact on accompli…
-
Multi-agent systems and their applicationsJing Xie, Chen-Ching Liu · 2017 · Journal of International Council on Electrical Engineering · cited 142 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
The number of distributed energy components and devices continues to increase globally. As a result, distributed control schemes are desirable for managing and utilizing these devices, together wit...
-
An Analysis and Comparison of ACT-R and SoarJ. Laird · 2022 · arXiv.org · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 22 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
This is a detailed analysis and comparison of the ACT-R and Soar cognitive architectures, including their overall structure, their representations of agent data and metadata, and their associated processing. It focuses on working memory, procedural memory, and long-term declarative memory. I emphasize the commonalities, which are many, but also highlight the differences. I identify the processes and distinct classes of information used by these architectures, including agent data, metadata, and meta-process data, and explore the roles that metadata play in decision making, memory retrievals, and learning.
-
Success is not Final; Failure is not Fatal - Task Success and User Experience in Interactions with Alexa, Google Assistant and SiriMiriam Kurz, Birgit Popp, Michael Breiter · 2021 · Interacción · cited 12 times · Not summarized yet
-
Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspectiveManuele Brambilla, E. Ferrante, M. Birattari et al. · 2013 · Swarm Intelligence · cited 1,855 times · Not summarized yet
Papers that cite it
-
The Rise of Agentic AI: Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Future Research AgendaMd. Asadul Islam, Subbulakshmi Somu, F. Aldaihani · 2025 · Global Business and Organizational Excellence · cited 28 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Agentic artificial intelligence (AAI) represents a significant evolution in the field of AI, moving beyond traditional and generative systems toward models characterized by autonomy, adaptivity, proactiveness, and decision agency. Unlike earlier AI paradigms that were reactive or limited to narrow tasks, AAI integrates reasoning, memory, planning, and tool orchestration to pursue complex objectives with minimal human oversight. Using a systematic literature review method, this study synthesizes current knowledge on AAI by examining its conceptual foundations, practical applications, and emerging research directions. Conceptually, AAI is distinguished from automation, generative AI, and multi…
-
Future of Work with AI Agents: Auditing Automation and Augmentation Potential across the U.S. WorkforceYijia Shao, Humishka Zope, Yucheng Jiang et al. · 2025 · Computers and Society · preprint, not peer reviewed · cited 56 times · AI summary available
Abstract
The rapid rise of compound AI systems (a.k.a., AI agents) is reshaping the labor market, raising concerns about job displacement, diminished human agency, and overreliance on automation. Yet, we lack a systematic understanding of the evolving landscape. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing a novel auditing framework to assess which occupational tasks workers want AI agents to automate or augment, and how those desires align with the current technological capabilities. Our framework features an audio-enhanced mini-interview to capture nuanced worker desires and introduces the Human Agency Scale (HAS) as a shared language to quantify the preferred level of human involvement. Using…
-
Agentic AI: A Perspective on Architecture, Frameworks and ApplicationsPriyadarshini Raghavendra, Manob Saikia · 2026 · Applied Informatics · cited 4 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
This review examines the evolution and architectural foundations of agentic artificial intelligence (AI), with a focus on collaborative multi-agent systems for complex task execution. The paper analyzes the core components, agent architectures, coordination mechanisms, application domains, and deployment challenges that enable autonomous reasoning and decision-making in real-world environments. To complement the survey, a comparative cryptocurrency market analysis case study is conducted using CrewAI, LangChain, and LangGraph focusing on workflow orchestration characteristics such as tool invocation, task transitions, orchestration depth, and memory integration. The findings are further supp…
-
Building MCP-native hierarchical AI scientist ecosystems: a perspective on scaling multi-agent scientific discoveryLing Yue, Ching-Yun Ko, Pin-Yu Chen et al. · 2026 · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · cited 5 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are evolving from chatbots with limited tool-using capabilities to agentic AI systems that can perform deep research, assist in proposing hypotheses, help design experiments, automate data analysis, and draft scientific reports. However, there are currently two bottlenecks limiting LLMs' real-world impact on the broader scientific research community beyond academic demonstrations: lack of interoperability (repetitive manual tool-integration is required across scenarios) and the need for scalable coordination (unstructured communication and memory become brittle as the number of agents grows). In this Perspective, we argue that the next phase of agentic scientific…
-
Service-Oriented Evolution of Modern AI: A Position PaperLi Zheng, C. McKie, Hui Wang et al. · 2025 · 2025 IEEE International Conference on Software Services Engineering (SSE) · cited 2 times · Not summarized yet
Abstract
[Context]: It is well known that understanding the evolution of technologies and its cause is essential for more discoveries and innovations. In the Artificial Intelligence (AI) domain, it has also been identified that scrutinising the development context and path of AI will be able to help both academia and industry better understand the current AI limitations, reveal future AI trends, and facilitate AI/digital transformations. [Objectives]: Given the dramatic boom of modern AI, this research aims to unearth the evolution pattern along the recent three AI waves (namely predictive AI, generative AI and agentic AI), and accordingly to guide AI research and development to focus on the most pro…
Go further
How are these papers found?
We compare the title and abstract of this paper with those of every paper summarized on this site, and with the papers Semantic Scholar recommends, those it cites and those citing it (for a much-cited paper, its most recent citations and, from OpenAlex, the most cited ones). Among the prior work and the follow-ups, the papers that use each other in depth, a method it uses and the much-cited follow-ups come a little higher. The levels (very close, close, related) come from the similarity of the texts, not from a judgment of quality; * marks a paper without an abstract, compared by its title. The sentence under a paper is written by an AI from the two abstracts: check it in the papers. A paper marked not relevant by three readers leaves the list.
Updated on 1 November 2026.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.