Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2501.04682v1

, , , , In their paper titled "Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought," authors Violet Xiang, Charlie Snell, Kanishk Gandhi, Alon Albalak, Anikait Singh, Chase Blagden, Duy Phung, Rafael Rafailov, Nathan Lile, Dakota Mahan, Louis Castricato, Jan-Philipp Franken, Nick Haber and Chelsea Finn propose a novel framework called Meta Chain-of-Thought (Meta-CoT). This framework builds upon the traditional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by explicitly modeling the underlying reasoning processes necessary to construct a specific CoT. The authors present empirical evidence from cutting-edge models that demonstrate behaviors aligned with in-context search and investigate various methods for generating Meta-CoTs through process supervision, synthetic data generation and search algorithms. Furthermore, the paper outlines a detailed pipeline for training models to produce Meta-CoTs by incorporating instruction tuning with linearized search traces and reinforcement learning post-training. The authors also delve into open research questions such as scaling laws, verifier roles and the potential discovery of new reasoning algorithms. By providing both theoretical insights and practical guidelines for enabling Meta-CoT in Large Language Models (LLMs), this work sets the stage for enhanced human-like reasoning capabilities in artificial intelligence systems. Additionally,the authors highlight the importance of open-ended verification and CoT faithfulness in training advanced reasoning models on verifiable questions. These questions typically involve mathematical problems or scientific inquiries with symbolic or numerical answers. The paper emphasizes the need for further exploration in this area to enhance the fidelity of CoTs generated by AI systems based on significant human annotations and empirical observations.

• - Authors propose a novel framework called Meta Chain-of-Thought (Meta-CoT)
• - Meta-CoT builds upon traditional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by explicitly modeling reasoning processes
• - Empirical evidence from cutting-edge models demonstrates behaviors aligned with in-context search
• - Various methods for generating Meta-CoTs include process supervision, synthetic data generation, and search algorithms
• - Detailed pipeline outlined for training models to produce Meta-CoTs through instruction tuning, linearized search traces, and reinforcement learning post-training
• - Open research questions discussed such as scaling laws, verifier roles, and discovery of new reasoning algorithms
• - Importance of open-ended verification and CoT faithfulness highlighted in training advanced reasoning models on verifiable questions

SummaryAuthors have a new idea called Meta Chain-of-Thought (Meta-CoT) that improves traditional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by showing how we think. They used modern models to test this idea and found it works well for searching in context. Ways to make Meta-CoTs include watching, making up stories, and using search tools. To train models for Meta-CoTs, they follow a step-by-step plan with tuning, tracing, and learning after training. They also talk about big questions like size rules, checking roles, and finding new thinking steps. Definitions- Authors: People who write books or articles. - Framework: A basic structure or plan. - Modeling: Showing or explaining how something works. - Empirical evidence: Information based on real-world observations or data. - Generation: Creating or making something new. - Pipeline: A series of connected steps in a process. - Verifier: Someone who checks if something is true or correct. - Faithfulness: Being loyal or true to something.

Introduction: The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in recent years, with large language models (LLMs) being at the forefront of these advancements. These models have shown impressive capabilities in natural language processing tasks such as text generation and question-answering. However, one area where LLMs still struggle is in reasoning and critical thinking abilities. In their paper titled "Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought," Xiang et al. propose a novel framework called Meta Chain-of-Thought (Meta-CoT) that aims to bridge this gap by explicitly modeling the underlying reasoning processes necessary for constructing a specific CoT. Background: The traditional Chain-of-Thought (CoT) framework has been widely used in AI systems to generate coherent responses based on input questions or prompts. However, it lacks an explicit representation of the reasoning process behind each step of the chain. This can lead to limitations in understanding complex concepts and making logical connections between ideas. Meta-CoT Framework: To address this issue, Xiang et al. introduce the Meta-CoT framework, which builds upon the traditional CoT by incorporating a meta-reasoning component that explicitly models the underlying reasoning processes involved in constructing a CoT. The authors provide empirical evidence from cutting-edge models that demonstrate behaviors aligned with in-context search, highlighting its potential for enhancing human-like reasoning capabilities in AI systems. Generating Meta-CoTs: The paper outlines various methods for generating Meta-CoTs through process supervision, synthetic data generation, and search algorithms. Process supervision involves providing instructions or guidance during training to help model learn how to construct CoTs more effectively. Synthetic data generation involves creating artificial datasets with known answers and using them to train models on verifiable questions involving mathematical problems or scientific inquiries with symbolic or numerical answers. Training Models for Producing Meta-CoTs: Xiang et al.'s paper also presents a detailed pipeline for training models to produce Meta-CoTs. This involves incorporating instruction tuning with linearized search traces and reinforcement learning post-training. The authors highlight the importance of open-ended verification and CoT faithfulness in this process, emphasizing the need for further exploration in this area to enhance the fidelity of CoTs generated by AI systems. Open Research Questions: The paper also delves into several open research questions related to scaling laws, verifier roles, and potential discovery of new reasoning algorithms. These questions highlight the need for continued exploration and development in this area to improve the capabilities of LLMs in reasoning tasks. Conclusion: In conclusion, Xiang et al.'s paper "Towards System 2 Reasoning in LLMs: Learning How to Think With Meta Chain-of-Thought" proposes a novel framework that aims to enhance human-like reasoning capabilities in AI systems. By explicitly modeling the underlying reasoning processes involved in constructing a CoT, Meta-CoT has shown promising results in improving critical thinking abilities of LLMs. The authors provide practical guidelines for generating Meta-CoTs and training models on verifiable questions while highlighting important areas for future research. Overall, this work sets the stage for further advancements towards achieving system 2 reasoning abilities in LLMs.