Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2501.10326v1

Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized various aspects of human society, with academia playing a crucial role in both shaping and being influenced by these advancements. The integration of LLMs into academic publications has notably impacted the peer review process, leading to the emergence of automated scholarly paper review (ASPR). This concept, initially proposed in previous research, has now evolved into a phase where ASPR coexists alongside traditional peer review mechanisms. In this survey paper titled "Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey," authors Zhenzhen Zhuang, Jiandong Chen, Hongfeng Xu, Yuwen Jiang, and Jialiang Lin delve into the transformative potential of LLMs for ASPR while also addressing the new challenges they present. The study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ASPR in the era of LLMs by exploring various facets of its implementation. The survey begins by identifying which specific LLMs are commonly utilized for conducting ASPR. Subsequently, the authors examine how technological bottlenecks related to ASPR have been overcome through the incorporation of LLM technology. They also investigate novel methods, datasets, source code, and online systems that have emerged alongside LLMs for ASPR applications. Furthermore, the paper delves into an analysis of the performance and issues associated with using LLMs in ASPR. It also explores the attitudes and reactions of publishers and academia towards adopting ASPR as a part of their manuscript review processes. Additionally, the study discusses the challenges that researchers face in developing LLMs tailored for ASPR applications. Overall,this survey serves as a valuable reference for researchers seeking to understand and contribute to the ongoing progress of ASPR implementation. By shedding light on the current landscape of LLM-driven scholarly paper reviews,it aims to inspire further advancements in this field and facilitate smoother integration of automated processes within academic publishing practices.

• - Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized various aspects of human society
• - Integration of LLMs into academic publications has impacted the peer review process, leading to automated scholarly paper review (ASPR)
• - ASPR coexists alongside traditional peer review mechanisms
• - Survey paper titled "Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey" explores transformative potential of LLMs for ASPR and addresses new challenges
• - Overview of ASPR implementation, identification of commonly used LLMs, overcoming technological bottlenecks, emergence of novel methods and systems
• - Analysis of performance and issues associated with using LLMs in ASPR, attitudes and reactions of publishers and academia towards adopting ASPR
• - Discussion on challenges researchers face in developing LLMs tailored for ASPR applications
• - Valuable reference for researchers seeking to understand and contribute to progress in ASPR implementation

SummaryLarge language models (LLMs) are big, smart tools that have changed many things in our world. They are now being used to help check and review academic papers faster. This new way of reviewing papers is called automated scholarly paper review (ASPR). ASPR works together with the old-fashioned way of reviewing papers. A special survey paper talks about how LLMs can make ASPR better and talks about the problems we might face. Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Big tools that understand and use language to help with different tasks. - Academic publications: Books, articles, or papers written by scholars and experts for others to read. - Peer review process: When experts check and give feedback on each other's work before it gets published. - Automated scholarly paper review (ASPR): Using technology like LLMs to help speed up the process of checking academic papers. - Survey paper: A special kind of article that looks at a lot of information on a specific topic and shares what it finds.

Introduction

Large language models (LLMs) have become a game-changing technology in recent years, revolutionizing various aspects of human society. From virtual assistants to chatbots, LLMs have made their presence felt in almost every industry. However, one area where they have had a significant impact is academia. The integration of LLMs into academic publications has led to the emergence of automated scholarly paper review (ASPR), which has transformed the traditional peer review process. In this survey paper titled "Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey," authors Zhenzhen Zhuang, Jiandong Chen, Hongfeng Xu, Yuwen Jiang, and Jialiang Lin delve into the transformative potential of LLMs for ASPR while also addressing the new challenges they present. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of ASPR in the era of LLMs by exploring various facets of its implementation.

Background

The concept of using automated systems for scholarly paper reviews was first proposed in previous research studies. However, with advancements in LLM technology and its widespread adoption across industries, ASPR has now evolved into a phase where it coexists alongside traditional peer review mechanisms.

Objectives

The main objective of this survey is to examine how LLMs are being utilized for ASPR and explore the challenges and opportunities that arise from their integration into academic publishing practices. The study also aims to provide insights into current trends and future directions for researchers interested in contributing to this field.

Methodology

To achieve these objectives, the authors conducted an extensive literature review on existing research papers related to ASPR and LLMs. They identified relevant studies through keyword searches on databases such as Google Scholar and ACM Digital Library. Additionally, they also analyzed datasets, source code repositories, online systems,and other resources related to ASPR and LLMs.

LLMs for Automated Scholarly Paper Review

The survey begins by identifying which specific LLMs are commonly utilized for conducting ASPR. The authors found that the most widely used LLMs for this purpose are BERT, GPT-3, and XLNet. These models have shown promising results in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks and have been adapted for use in ASPR applications.

Overcoming Technological Bottlenecks

One of the biggest challenges in implementing ASPR is overcoming technological bottlenecks such as data scarcity and model complexity. However, with the incorporation of LLM technology, these bottlenecks have been significantly reduced. For instance, pre-trained LLMs can now be fine-tuned on smaller datasets to perform specific tasks, making it easier to develop models tailored for ASPR.

New Methods and Resources

The study also explores novel methods, datasets, source code,and online systems that have emerged alongside LLMs for ASPR applications. For example, some researchers have proposed a hybrid approach where traditional peer review is combined with automated reviews using LLMs to improve efficiency and accuracy. Additionally, several open-source datasets specifically designed for training LLMs for NLP tasks related to scholarly paper review have also been made available.

Performance Analysis

The paper delves into an analysis of the performance and issues associated with using LLMs in ASPR. While these models have shown promising results in various NLP tasks,some challenges still need to be addressed when applying them to academic publishing practices. One major concern is bias within the models due to their training data sources or underlying algorithms. This could potentially lead to biased decisions during automated reviews if not properly addressed.

Publisher and Academic Reactions

The study also explores the attitudes and reactions of publishers and academia towards adopting ASPR as a part of their manuscript review processes. While some have embraced this technology, others are hesitant due to concerns about its reliability and potential impact on traditional peer review practices. However, with more evidence of successful implementations and improvements in LLMs' performance, it is expected that more publishers will adopt ASPR in the future.

Challenges for Researchers

The survey also discusses the challenges that researchers face in developing LLMs tailored for ASPR applications. These include data scarcity, model complexity,and ethical considerations such as bias and fairness. Additionally, there is a need for standardized evaluation metrics to assess the performance of LLMs in scholarly paper reviews accurately.

Conclusion

This survey serves as a valuable reference for researchers seeking to understand and contribute to the ongoing progress of ASPR implementation. By shedding light on the current landscape of LLM-driven scholarly paper reviews,it aims to inspire further advancements in this field and facilitate smoother integration of automated processes within academic publishing practices. With continued research and development, it is expected that LLMs will play an even more significant role in transforming how scholarly papers are reviewed and published in the future.