Child vs. machine language learning: Can the logical structure of human language unleash LLMs?

AI-generated keywords: Language Learning Large Language Models (LLMs) Human Language Artificial Neural Networks Collaboration

AI-generated Key Points

  • Human language learning differs from current approaches to training Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Evidence from German plural formation by LLMs presented
  • Collaboration among computer scientists, linguists, and cognitive scientists suggested to enhance LLM performance
  • Importance of considering linguistic nuances and cognitive processes emphasized for improving AI models' language learning abilities
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Uli Sauerland, Celia Matthaei, Felix Salfner

ISCA/ITG Workshop on Diversity in Large Speech and Language Models
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: We argue that human language learning proceeds in a manner that is different in nature from current approaches to training LLMs, predicting a difference in learning biases. We then present evidence from German plural formation by LLMs that confirm our hypothesis that even very powerful implementations produce results that miss aspects of the logic inherent to language that humans have no problem with. We conclude that attention to the different structures of human language and artificial neural networks is likely to be an avenue to improve LLM performance.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Feb. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2502.17304v1

In their paper "Child vs. machine language learning: Can the logical structure of human language unleash LLMs? ", Uli Sauerland, Celia Matthaei, and Felix Salfner argue that human language learning differs from current approaches to training Large Language Models (LLMs). They present evidence from German plural formation by LLMs and suggest collaboration among computer scientists, linguists, and cognitive scientists to enhance LLM performance. The authors highlight the importance of considering linguistic nuances and cognitive processes in improving artificial intelligence models' language learning abilities. <br><br> Uli Sauerland, Celia Matthaei, and Felix Salfner discuss how human language learning differs from current approaches to training Large Language Models (LLMs). <br> The authors present evidence from German plural formation by LLMs and suggest collaboration among experts to enhance their performance. <br> The authors emphasize the unique structures of human language and advocate for their integration into LLM development to improve performance significantly. <br> The authors note that focusing on the distinct structures of human language could enhance LLM performance. <br> Uli Sauerland, Celia Matthaei, and Felix Salfner propose collaboration among computer scientists, linguists, and cognitive scientists to further enhance LLM capabilities.
Created on 05 May. 2025
Available in other languages: fr

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.