Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
AI-generated Key Points
- **Vibe Coding**:
- Emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction
- Supports ideation and creative exploration
- Excels in early-stage prototyping and education
- **Agentic Coding**:
- Enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents
- Capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention
- More suitable for enterprise-grade automation, codebase refactoring, and CI/CD integration
- **Hybrid Architectures**:
- Combine natural language interfaces with autonomous execution pipelines
- **Future Roadmap for Agentic AI**:
- Focuses on building trustworthy, explainable, and collaborative systems
- **Importance of Harmonizing Both Paradigms**:
- Vibe coding fosters co-creation and creativity
- Agentic coding represents a shift towards autonomous software engineering systems
Authors: Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Manoj Karkee
Abstract: This review presents a comprehensive analysis of two emerging paradigms in AI-assisted software development: vibe coding and agentic coding. While both leverage large language models (LLMs), they differ fundamentally in autonomy, architectural design, and the role of the developer. Vibe coding emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction through prompt-based, conversational workflows that support ideation, experimentation, and creative exploration. In contrast, agentic coding enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention. We propose a detailed taxonomy spanning conceptual foundations, execution models, feedback loops, safety mechanisms, debugging strategies, and real-world tool ecosystems. Through comparative workflow analysis and 20 detailed use cases, we illustrate how vibe systems thrive in early-stage prototyping and education, while agentic systems excel in enterprise-grade automation, codebase refactoring, and CI/CD integration. We further examine emerging trends in hybrid architectures, where natural language interfaces are coupled with autonomous execution pipelines. Finally, we articulate a future roadmap for agentic AI, outlining the infrastructure needed for trustworthy, explainable, and collaborative systems. Our findings suggest that successful AI software engineering will rely not on choosing one paradigm, but on harmonizing their strengths within a unified, human-centered development lifecycle.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.