MemAgent: Reshaping Long-Context LLM with Multi-Conv RL-based Memory Agent

Authors: Hongli Yu, Tinghong Chen, Jiangtao Feng, Jiangjie Chen, Weinan Dai, Qiying Yu, Ya-Qin Zhang, Wei-Ying Ma, Jingjing Liu, Mingxuan Wang, Hao Zhou

Project Page: https://memagent-sialab.github.io/
AI-generated keywords: Long-Context LLM Multi-Conv RL-based Memory Agent End-to-end Workflow Independent-context Multi-conversation Generation Linear Complexity

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • MemAgent introduced as a novel agent workflow for handling long-context tasks
  • Operates by reading text in segments and updating memory using an overwrite strategy
  • Extends DAPO algorithm to support training through independent-context multi-conversation generation
  • Demonstrates impressive capabilities in handling long-context tasks with minimal performance loss (<5%)
  • Achieves over 95% accuracy in the 512K RULER test
  • Represents significant advancements in addressing challenges of processing infinitely long documents while maintaining linear complexity
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: Despite improvements by length extrapolation, efficient attention and memory modules, handling infinitely long documents with linear complexity without performance degradation during extrapolation remains the ultimate challenge in long-text processing. We directly optimize for long-text tasks in an end-to-end fashion and introduce a novel agent workflow, MemAgent, which reads text in segments and updates the memory using an overwrite strategy. We extend the DAPO algorithm to facilitate training via independent-context multi-conversation generation. MemAgent has demonstrated superb long-context capabilities, being able to extrapolate from an 8K context trained on 32K text to a 3.5M QA task with performance loss < 5% and achieves 95%+ in 512K RULER test.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Jul. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2507.02259v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
The paper titled "MemAgent: Reshaping Long-Context LLM with Multi-Conv RL-based Memory Agent" addresses the challenge of efficiently processing long texts without sacrificing performance. The authors - Hongli Yu, Tinghong Chen, Jiangtao Feng, Jiangjie Chen, Weinan Dai, Qiying Yu, Ya-Qin Zhang, Wei-Ying Ma, Jingjing Liu, Mingxuan Wang and Hao Zhou - introduce MemAgent as a novel agent workflow designed to handle long-context tasks in an end-to-end manner. MemAgent operates by reading text in segments and updating memory using an overwrite strategy. By extending the DAPO algorithm to support training through independent-context multi-conversation generation, MemAgent showcases impressive capabilities in handling long-context tasks. The model can extrapolate from an 8K context trained on 32K text to a 3.5M question-answering task with minimal performance loss (<5%) and achieves over 95% accuracy in the 512K RULER test. This innovative approach demonstrates significant advancements in addressing the challenges associated with processing infinitely long documents while maintaining linear complexity. The authors' work represents a crucial step forward in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of long-text processing algorithms.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.