Self-Selection, University Courses and Returns to Advanced Degrees
AI-generated Key Points
- Study examines labor market returns of bachelor's and master's degree combinations in Italy
- Utilizes detailed data on Italian graduates and university programs
- Investigates how curriculum characteristics impact outcomes
- Estimates returns to 43 degree combinations using exogenous variation in access to higher education
- Significant variation in returns among different combinations
- Combinations of degrees from different disciplines have a positive impact on economic outcomes
- Successful combinations feature more non-quantitative education at the bachelor's level rather than just quantitative courses alone
- Italian higher education system follows the Bologna process, offering bachelor's (three years) and master's (two years) degrees with credit-based workloads
- Admission to a master's program requires completion of a bachelor's degree, with degrees organized into various fields of study
- Program characteristics such as timing, quantitativeness, and multidisciplinarity identified as traits that enhance labor market outcomes for graduates
Authors: Eleonora Brandimarti
Abstract: Higher education often requires choosing a bachelor's and a master's degree, yet the returns of these combined choices and the role of courses in different disciplines remain understudied. This paper addresses this gap using detailed data on Italian graduates and university programs. I study the labor market returns to combinations of bachelor's and master's degrees and investigate how curriculum characteristics affect outcomes. I exploit exogenous variation in access to bachelor's and master's degrees to causally estimate the returns to 43 combinations of degrees. I organize the data in a nested model with exogenous variation in admission requirements and explore the preference profile of the sample through policy simulations that shift these requirements. I then relate the estimated returns to the academic curriculum of degrees, focusing on the role of quantitative education and timing of courses. I contribute to the literature on returns to advanced degrees by incorporating master's degrees in the discussion on how higher education affects outcomes and providing evidence on the characteristics of curricula that are positively related to labor market returns. The findings reveal substantial variation in returns to degree combinations, even among combinations with the same bachelor's degree, indicating the need to consider both types of programs. Combinations of degrees in different disciplines positively impact economic outcomes, while those in the same field perform worse. Successful combinations feature more non-quantitative education in the bachelor's, and quantitative courses alone do not explain higher returns.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.