Whatever Remains Must Be True: Filtering Drives Reasoning in LLMs, Shaping Diversity

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Reinforcement Learning (RL) used for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Drawback of RL models: reduction in diversity due to mode-seeking KL divergence
  • Proposed solution: starting from an explicit target distribution derived by filtering incorrect answers while preserving relative probabilities of correct ones
  • Approach involves approximating refined target distribution using $α$-divergence family for control over precision and diversity
  • New methodology tested on Lean theorem-proving benchmark, showcasing state-of-the-art performance along coverage-precision Pareto frontier
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Germán Kruszewski, Pierre Erbacher, Jos Rozen, Marc Dymetman

Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become the de facto standard for tuning LLMs to solve tasks involving reasoning. However, growing evidence shows that models trained in such way often suffer from a significant loss in diversity. We argue that this arises because RL implicitly optimizes the "mode-seeking" or "zero-forcing" Reverse KL to a target distribution causing the model to concentrate mass on certain high-probability regions of the target while neglecting others. In this work, we instead begin from an explicit target distribution, obtained by filtering out incorrect answers while preserving the relative probabilities of correct ones. Starting from a pre-trained LLM, we approximate this target distribution using the $α$-divergence family, which unifies prior approaches and enables direct control of the precision-diversity trade-off by interpolating between mode-seeking and mass-covering divergences. On a Lean theorem-proving benchmark, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance along the coverage-precision Pareto frontier, outperforming all prior methods on the coverage axis.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Dec. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2512.05962v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the realm of artificial intelligence, Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as the go-to technique for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle tasks that require reasoning abilities. However, recent findings have indicated a notable drawback associated with models trained using RL – a significant reduction in diversity. This phenomenon is attributed to RL's implicit optimization of the "mode-seeking" or "zero-forcing" Reverse Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence towards a target distribution. As a result, the model tends to concentrate its focus on specific high-probability regions of the target distribution while neglecting others. To address this issue, a novel approach is proposed in this study. Instead of relying on RL and its inherent biases, the researchers advocate for starting from an explicit target distribution. This distribution is derived by filtering out incorrect answers while preserving the relative probabilities of correct ones. Leveraging a pre-trained LLM as the foundation, the team approximates this refined target distribution using the $α$-divergence family. This family of divergences offers a unified framework that allows for direct control over the trade-off between precision and diversity by smoothly transitioning between mode-seeking and mass-covering divergences. The efficacy of this new methodology is put to the test on a Lean theorem-proving benchmark. The results speak volumes about its success, showcasing state-of-the-art performance along the coverage-precision Pareto frontier. Notably, this approach surpasses all previous methods when evaluated on the coverage axis, demonstrating superior capabilities in balancing both coverage and precision in reasoning tasks. Authored by Germán Kruszewski, Pierre Erbacher, Jos Rozen, and Marc Dymetman, this research paper titled "Whatever Remains Must Be True: Filtering Drives Reasoning in LLMs, Shaping Diversity" sheds light on an innovative strategy to enhance diversity and performance in LLMs through targeted filtering techniques and divergence-based optimization strategies.
Created on 08 Dec. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.