Optimal design for the planar Skorokhod embedding problem

AI-generated keywords: Optimal design

AI-generated Key Points

  • Boudabra and co-authors revisit Gross' original formulation of the planar Skorokhod embedding problem
  • They place the problem within a fully variational framework
  • Gross' μ-domain Uμ^G uniquely minimizes area among all simply connected μ-domains for a centered probability measure μ with finite second moment
  • Minimization is equivalent to minimizing a natural H^(1/2)-type boundary energy, providing an optimal design interpretation of the planar Skorokhod embedding problem
  • Mathematical tools used include Fourier characterization of fractional Sobolev spaces on the circle, symmetric decreasing rearrangement of the quantile of μ, and a one-dimensional fractional Pólya-Szegő inequality
  • A sharp model case is obtained where the Gross area is uniquely minimized by the shifted arcsine distribution within the Schlicht class
  • Brownian symmetrization dominates Steiner symmetrization in terms of area reduction, quantified through a ratio ρ(U)
  • Every value in (0,1] can be attained among simply connected domains of fixed area through Brownian symmetrization techniques
  • Geometric properties are preserved despite changes in underlying distributions, illustrated through examples such as thin rectangles collapsing to Dirac masses in L^2 while maintaining their size according to Gross domains
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Maher Boudabra

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We revisit the planar Skorokhod embedding problem introduced by Gross and developed further by Boudabra-Markowsky, and we place it in a fully variational framework. For a centered probability measure $μ$ with finite second moment, we show that Gross' $μ$ -domain $U_μ^{G}$ uniquely minimizes the area among all simply connected $μ$ -domains. Equivalently, $U_μ^{G}$ minimizes a natural $H^{\frac{1}{2}}$-type boundary energy, providing an optimal design interpretation of the planar Skorokhod embedding problem. The proof relies on the Fourier characterization of fractional Sobolev spaces on the circle, symmetric decreasing rearrangement of the quantile of $μ$ , and a one-dimensional fractional $Pólya-Szegő$ inequality. Within the Schlicht class, we obtain a sharp model case: under a natural normalization of the quantile, the Gross area is uniquely minimized by the shifted arcsine distribution. This identifies the Gross domain of the arcsine law as the extremal Schlicht solution to the planar Skorokhod embedding problem. In the second part of the paper we return to Brownian symmetrization. Using the optimality of $U_μ^{G}$, we prove that Brownian symmetrization is area-nonincreasing and, in fact, dominates Steiner symmetrization in this regard. We then quantify the ratio $$ρ(U):=\frac{\mathcal{A}(U_μ^{G})}{\mathcal{A}(U)},$$showing that, among simply connected domains of fixed area, every value in $(0,1]$ is attained. A family of thin rectangles provides a striking example where the associated one-dimensional laws collapse to a Dirac mass in $L^{2}$ while the Gross domain does not shrink, illustrating the genuinely fractional nature of the underlying $H^{\frac{1}{2}}$-geometry. Altogether, our results clarify the geometric content of the planar Skorokhod embedding and open a systematic program of "optimal design" via Brownian symmetrization.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Dec. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2512.12796v1

In their paper "Optimal design for the planar Skorokhod embedding problem," Maher Boudabra and his co-authors revisit and expand upon Gross' original formulation of the planar Skorokhod embedding problem. They place this problem within a fully variational framework and demonstrate that, for a centered probability measure μ with finite second moment, Gross' μ-domain Uμ^G uniquely minimizes area among all simply connected μ-domains. This minimization is equivalent to minimizing a natural H^(1/2)-type boundary energy, providing an optimal design interpretation of the planar Skorokhod embedding problem. The proof of this result relies on various mathematical tools such as the Fourier characterization of fractional Sobolev spaces on the circle, symmetric decreasing rearrangement of the quantile of μ, and a one-dimensional fractional Pólya-Szegő inequality. Within the Schlicht class, a sharp model case is obtained where, under a natural normalization of the quantile, the Gross area is uniquely minimized by the shifted arcsine distribution. This identifies the Gross domain of the arcsine law as an extremal Schlicht solution to the planar Skorokhod embedding problem. In addition to studying Gross domains, Boudabra et al. also investigate Brownian symmetrization in relation to area non-increasing properties. They prove that Brownian symmetrization dominates Steiner symmetrization in terms of area reduction and quantify this behavior through a ratio ρ(U), which shows that every value in (0,1] can be attained among simply connected domains of fixed area. Furthermore, through examples such as thin rectangles collapsing to Dirac masses in L^2 while maintaining their size according to Gross domains, the authors illustrate how certain geometric properties are preserved despite changes in underlying distributions. Overall, these results shed light on the geometric content of the planar Skorokhod embedding problem and suggest avenues for further exploration through optimal design principles using Brownian symmetrization techniques.
Created on 24 Feb. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.