Contrasting evolutionary pathways of fast- and slow-rotating galaxies in the green valley

AI-generated keywords: Green Valley galaxies

AI-generated Key Points

  • Investigated evolutionary pathways of Green Valley (GV) galaxies using SDSS-IV/MaNGA survey data
  • Categorized GV sample into fast- and slow-rotating galaxies based on stellar spin
  • Fast-rotating galaxies consistently exhibit higher metallicities in gas and stars compared to slow-rotating galaxies
  • Utilized a chemical evolution model to analyze star formation and enrichment histories, constraining parameters related to gas inflow and outflow processes
  • Slow-rotating galaxies at lower masses experience stronger outflows, leading to reduced chemical content in both gas and stars compared to fast-rotating galaxies
  • At higher masses, slower rotating galaxies have comparable gas-phase metallicities but lower stellar metallicities than fast-rotating galaxies
  • Suggested distinct evolutionary pathways for GV galaxies based on merger history, supernova-driven outflows, and AGN feedback effects
  • Discussed alternative environmental and assembly-driven scenarios in addition to main conclusions
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Shuang Zhou, Angela Iovino, Marcella Longhetti, Francesco La Barbera, Luca Costantin

arXiv: 2603.18292v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
18 pages, 10 figures; accepted for publication in A&A; abstract shortened
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We investigate the evolutionary pathways of green valley (GV) galaxies drawn from the SDSS-IV/MaNGA survey. The GV sample is divided into fast- and slow-rotating galaxies based on stellar spin, and their stellar and gas-phase metallicities are compared. Fast-rotating galaxies exhibit systematically higher metallicities than slow-rotating galaxies in both gas and stars. However, the gas-phase difference is significant only at low stellar masses, while the stellar metallicity offset persists across the full mass range. Using a simple yet physically motivated chemical evolution model, optimised to jointly fit gas-phase metallicities and integrated stellar spectra, we reconstruct the star formation and chemical enrichment histories of individual galaxies and constrain gas inflow and outflow parameters. At low stellar masses, fast- and slow-rotating galaxies show similar gas-infall and star formation timescales, but the the slower population experienced stronger outflows which reduce their chemical content in both gas and stars. At high masses, the combination of reduced pristine gas inflow and more efficient gas removal in slow-rotating galaxies produce gas-phase metallicities comparable to fast-rotating galaxies but systematically lower stellar metallicities. These differences suggest distinct evolutionary pathways for GV galaxies. Slow-rotating galaxies likely experienced more mergers, usually associated with strong gas removal processes, leading to their systematically lower metallicities. At low masses, stronger supernova-driven outflows reduce their chemical content while leaving star-formation timescales similar to fast-rotating galaxies. At high masses, merger-triggered AGN feedback may rapidly deplete and suppress gas infall, producing the shorter star-formation timescales seen in slow-rotating galaxies. Alternative environmental and assembly-driven scenarios are also discussed.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Mar. 2026

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2603.18292v1

, , , , Our paper investigates the evolutionary pathways of Green Valley (GV) galaxies using data from the SDSS-IV/MaNGA survey. The GV sample is categorized into fast- and slow-rotating galaxies based on stellar spin, with a focus on comparing their stellar and gas-phase metallicities. Our analysis reveals that fast-rotating galaxies consistently exhibit higher metallicities than slow-rotating galaxies in both gas and stars. This difference is more pronounced at lower stellar masses, while the offset in stellar metallicity persists across the entire mass range. To further understand these differences, we utilize a simple yet physically motivated chemical evolution model to analyze the data. By fitting the model to the observed data, we are able to reconstruct the star formation and chemical enrichment histories of individual galaxies. This analysis also allows us to constrain parameters related to gas inflow and outflow processes. At lower stellar masses, both fast- and slow-rotating galaxies show similar gas-infall and star formation timescales. However, slow-rotating galaxies experience stronger outflows, leading to a reduction in their chemical content in both gas and stars compared to their fast-rotating counterparts. Conversely, at higher masses, slower rotating galaxies exhibit comparable gas-phase metallicities to fast-rotating galaxies but have systematically lower stellar metallicities. These findings suggest distinct evolutionary pathways for GV galaxies. Slow-rotating galaxies likely underwent more mergers, which are often associated with significant gas removal processes resulting in lower metallicities. Additionally, at low masses, stronger supernova-driven outflows contribute to reducing the chemical content of slow-rotating galaxies while maintaining similar star formation timescales as fast-rotating galaxies. At higher masses, merger-triggered AGN feedback may play a role in depleting and suppressing gas infall, leading to shorter star formation timescales observed in slow-rotating galaxies. In addition to these main conclusions, alternative environmental and assembly-driven scenarios are also discussed throughout our analysis. The paper is structured with detailed sections covering data collection from MaNGA observations as well as an explanation of the galaxy evolution model used for interpretation. Our key findings are summarized at the end of the paper for easy reference.
Created on 23 Mar. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.