SPH Simulations of Counterrotating Disk Formation in Spiral Galaxies
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Thakar and Ryden's study focuses on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of massive counterrotating disks in spiral galaxies
- They explore adiabatic gas infall and retrograde gas-rich dwarf mergers as processes for generating counterrotating disks
- Experiments involve cold primary models resembling our Galaxy and hot, compact primary models like NGC 4138
- Significant differences are found in the structure of SPH-generated counterrotating disks compared to those formed with sticky particles, with SPH disks being thinner
- SPH simulations show shorter time-scales for forming counterrotating disks due to rapid loss of kinetic energy and angular momentum by the gas
- Spiral structures are evident in most disks, but an exponential radial profile is not naturally observed through these processes
- Infalling gas shells result in the formation of counterrotating bulges and rings rather than traditional disks
- Presence of preexisting prograde gas leads to swift inflow towards the center, causing a void in the counterrotating disk when star formation is absent
- SPH simulations suggest that accretion of massive counterrotating disks plays a pivotal role in driving host galaxies towards earlier Hubble types (S0/Sa)
Authors: A. R. Thakar (Center for Astrophysical Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University), B. S. Ryden (Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University)
Abstract: We present the results of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of the formation of a massive counterrotating disk in a spiral galaxy. The current study revisits and extends (with SPH) previous work carried out with sticky particle gas dynamics, in which adiabatic gas infall and a retrograde gas-rich dwarf merger were tested as the two most likely processes for producing such a counterrotating disk. We report on experiments with a cold primary similar to our Galaxy, as well as a hot, compact primary modeled after NGC 4138. We have also conducted numerical experiments with varying amounts of prograde gas in the primary disk, and an alternative infall model (a spherical shell with retrograde angular momentum). The structure of the resulting counterrotating disks is dramatically different with SPH. The disks we produce are considerably thinner than the primary disks and those produced with sticky particles. The time-scales for counterrotating disk formation are shorter with SPH because the gas loses kinetic energy and angular momentum more rapidly. Spiral structure is evident in most of the disks, but an exponential radial profile is not a natural byproduct of these processes. The infalling gas shells that we tested produce counterrotating bulges and rings rather than disks. The presence of a considerable amount of preexisting prograde gas in the primary causes, at least in the absence of star formation, a rapid inflow of gas to the center and a subsequent hole in the counterrotating disk. In general, our SPH experiments yield stronger evidence to suggest that the accretion of massive counterrotating disks drives the evolution of the host galaxies towards earlier (S0/Sa) Hubble types.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.