# Are Quantum States Exponentially Long Vectors?

**Authors:** Scott Aaronson  
**arXiv:** [quant-ph/0507242](https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0507242)  
**Date:** 2005-07-26  
**Summary page:** https://www.summarizepaper.com/en/arxiv-id/quant-ph--0507242v1/

## Key points

- Scott Aaronson expresses gratitude towards Oded Goldreich for inviting him to the 2005 Oberwolfach Meeting on Complexity Theory.
- The paper titled "Are Quantum States Exponentially Long Vectors?" is an extended abstract based on a talk given at the event.
- Aaronson challenges and refutes Goldreich's views on quantum computing, arguing that they are fundamentally flawed.
- Despite not presenting new results, Aaronson engages in informal discourse to debunk Goldreich's assertions about quantum states.
- The paper aims to shed light on inaccuracies in Goldreich's understanding of quantum computing and serves as a platform for intellectual debate.

## Summary

In his paper titled "Are Quantum States Exponentially Long Vectors? ", Scott Aaronson expresses gratitude towards Oded Goldreich for inviting him to the 2005 Oberwolfach Meeting on Complexity Theory. The extended abstract, based on a talk given at the event, delves into a critical analysis of Goldreich's views on quantum computing. Aaronson challenges and refutes Goldreich's perspectives, arguing that they are fundamentally flawed. Despite not presenting any new results in the paper, Aaronson engages in informal discourse to debunk Goldreich's assertions about quantum states. Through this examination, Aaronson aims to shed light on the inaccuracies in Goldreich's understanding of quantum computing. The paper serves as a platform for intellectual debate and offers insights into the complexities of quantum theory.