AI summary · arXiv: 2305.19860v1 · cs.IR

A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation

Likang Wu, Zhi Zheng, Zhaopeng Qiu, Hao Wang, Hongchao Gu, Tingjia Shen, Chuan Qin, Chen Zhu,

and 4 more authorsHengshu Zhu, Qi Liu, Hui Xiong, Enhong Chen

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 31 May. 2023 10 pages, 3 figures License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Recommendation Systems (RS)
  • LLMs are trained on massive amounts of data using self-supervised learning
  • LLMs have shown remarkable success in learning universal representations
  • LLMs can enhance recommendation systems through transfer techniques like fine-tuning and prompt tuning
  • High-quality representations of textual features and extensive coverage of external knowledge are key aspects of leveraging language models in improving recommendation quality
  • Two major paradigms for LLM-based recommendation systems: Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec)
  • Existing LLM-based recommendation systems within each paradigm are reviewed and analyzed, providing insights into methodologies, techniques, and performance
  • Key challenges associated with LLM-based recommendation systems are identified
  • Valuable findings that can inspire researchers and practitioners in this domain are presented
  • This survey serves as an essential resource for understanding the current landscape of LLM-based recommendation systems.

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Natural Language Processing Recommendation Systems Discriminative LLM4Rec Generative LLM4Rec

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and have gained significant attention in Recommendation Systems (RS). These models, trained on massive amounts of data using self-supervised learning, have shown remarkable success in learning universal representations and have the potential to enhance various aspects of recommendation systems through effective transfer techniques such as fine-tuning and prompt tuning. The key aspect of leveraging language models in improving recommendation quality lies in their high-quality representations of textual features and extensive coverage of external knowledge, which allows for establishing correlations between items and users. To provide a comprehensive understanding of LLM-based recommendation systems, this survey introduces a taxonomy that categorizes these models into two major paradigms: Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec). Within each paradigm, existing LLM-based recommendation systems are reviewed and analyzed, offering insights into their methodologies, techniques, and performance. Furthermore, this survey identifies key challenges associated with LLM-based recommendation systems. It also presents several valuable findings that can inspire researchers and practitioners working in this domain. With the increasing popularity of large language models in NLP and RS fields, this survey provides an essential resource for understanding the current landscape of LLM-based recommendation systems.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.