Search by
Refine results

Years refer to the arXiv submission date or the publication date. Journal and ORCID filters use indexed publication records.

    Include journals

    Match any selected journal.

    Exclude journals

    Exclude every selected journal.

    Clear filters

    Some sources are temporarily unavailable. Results may be incomplete; please try again shortly.

    Michael Ward
    Robert H. Martin
    CURTIS GREENE
    Michał Lipiński, Konstantin Mischaikow, Marian Mrozek

    Abstract Motivated by the study of recurrent orbits and dynamics within a Morse set of a Morse decomposition we introduce the concept of Morse predecomposition of an isolated invariant set within the setting of both combinatorial and classical dynamical systems. …

    Read the full abstract

    Abstract Motivated by the study of recurrent orbits and dynamics within a Morse set of a Morse decomposition we introduce the concept of Morse predecomposition of an isolated invariant set within the setting of both combinatorial and classical dynamical systems. While Morse decomposition summarizes solely the gradient part of a dynamical system, the developed generalization extends to the recurrent component as well. In particular, a chain recurrent set, which is indecomposable in terms of Morse decomposition, can be represented more finely in the Morse predecomposition framework. This generalization is achieved by forgoing the poset structure inherent to Morse decomposition and relaxing the notion of connection between Morse sets (elements of Morse decomposition) in favor of what we term ’links’. We prove that a Morse decomposition is a special case of Morse predecomposition indexed by a poset. Additionally, we show how a Morse predecomposition may be condensed back to retrieve a Morse decomposition.

    A. B. Kharazishvili
    Domingo A. Herrero
    John R. Steel
    Jonte R Hance, Tim N Palmer, John Rarity

    Abstract We identify points of difference between Invariant Set Theory and standard quantum theory, and show that these lead to noticeable differences in predictions between the two theories. We design a number of experiments to test which of these predictions …

    Read the full abstract

    Abstract We identify points of difference between Invariant Set Theory and standard quantum theory, and show that these lead to noticeable differences in predictions between the two theories. We design a number of experiments to test which of these predictions corresponds to our world. If these experiments were undertaken, they would allow us to investigate whether standard quantum theory or invariant set theory best describes reality. These tests can also be deployed on theories sharing similar properties (e.g., Penrose’s gravitational collapse theory).

    A. B. Kharazishvili