Accretion rates in hierarchical triple systems with discs
Authors: Simone Ceppi, Nicolás Cuello, Giuseppe Lodato, Cathie Clarke, Claudia Toci, Daniel J. Price
Abstract: Young multiple systems accrete most of their final mass in the first few Myr of their lifetime, during the protostellar and protoplanetary phases. Previous studies showed that in binary systems the majority of the accreted mass falls onto the lighter star, thus evolving to mass equalisation. However, young stellar systems often comprise more than two stars, which are expected to be in hierarchical configurations. Despite its astrophysical relevance, differential accretion in hierarchical systems remains to be understood. In this work, we investigate whether the accretion trends expected in binaries are valid for higher order multiples. We performed a set of 3D Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics simulations of binaries and of hierarchical triples (HTs) embedded in an accretion disc, with the code Phantom. We identify for the first time accretion trends in HTs and their deviations compared to binaries. These deviations, due to the interaction of the small binary with the infalling material from the circum-triple disc, can be described with a semi-analytical prescription. Generally, the smaller binary of a HT accretes more mass than a single star of the same mass as the smaller binary. We found that in a HT, if the small binary is heavier than the third body, the standard differential accretion scenario (whereby the secondary accretes more of the mass) is hampered. Reciprocally, if the small binary is lighter than the third body, the standard differential accretion scenario is enhanced. The peculiar differential accretion mechanism we find in HTs is expected to affect their mass ratio distribution.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.