Measurement of suppression of large-radius jets and its dependence on substructure in Pb+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV with the ATLAS detector
Authors: ATLAS Collaboration
Abstract: This letter presents a measurement of the nuclear modification factor of large-radius jets in $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV Pb+Pb collisions by the ATLAS experiment. The measurement is performed using 1.72 nb$^{-1}$ and 257 pb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb and $pp$ data, respectively. The large-radius jets are reconstructed with the anti-$k_{t}$ algorithm using a radius parameter of $R = 1.0$, by re-clustering anti-$k_{t}$ $R = 0.2$ jets, and are measured over the kinematic range of $158 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 1000$ GeV and $|y|<2.0$. The large-radius jet constituents are further re-clustered using the $k_{t}$ algorithm in order to obtain the splitting parameters, $\sqrt{d_{12}}$ and $\Delta R_{12}$, which characterize the transverse momentum scale and angular separation for the hardest splitting in the jet, respectively. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$, obtained by comparing the Pb+Pb jet yields to those in $pp$ collisions, is measured as a function of jet transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) and $\sqrt{d_{12}}$ or $\Delta R_{12}$. A significant difference in the quenching of large-radius jets having single sub-jet and those with more complex substructure is observed. Systematic comparison of jet suppression in terms of $R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ for different jet definitions is also provided. Presented results support the hypothesis that jets with hard internal splittings lose more energy through quenching and provide a new perspective for understanding the role of jet structure in jet suppression.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.