Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Computer Graphics Images
Authors: Zicheng Zhang, Wei Sun, Tao Wang, Wei Lu, Quan Zhou, Jun he, Qiyuan Wang, Xiongkuo Min, Guangtao Zhai
Abstract: Computer graphics images (CGIs) are artificially generated by means of computer programs and are widely perceived under various scenarios, such as games, streaming media, etc. In practical, the quality of CGIs consistently suffers from poor rendering during the production and inevitable compression artifacts during the transmission of multimedia applications. However, few works have been dedicated to dealing with the challenge of computer graphics images quality assessment (CGIQA). Most image quality assessment (IQA) metrics are developed for natural scene images (NSIs) and validated on the databases consisting of NSIs with synthetic distortions, which are not suitable for in-the-wild CGIs. To bridge the gap between evaluating the quality of NSIs and CGIs, we construct a large-scale in-the-wild CGIQA database consisting of 6,000 CGIs (CGIQA-6k) and carry out the subjective experiment in a well-controlled laboratory environment to obtain the accurate perceptual ratings of the CGIs. Then, we propose an effective deep learning-based no-reference (NR) IQA model by utilizing multi-stage feature fusion strategy and multi-stage channel attention mechanism. The major motivation of the proposed model is to make full use of inter-channel information from low-level to high-level since CGIs have apparent patterns as well as rich interactive semantic content. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms all other state-of-the-art NR IQA methods on the constructed CGIQA-6k database and other CGIQA-related databases. The database along with the code will be released to facilitate further research.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.