The missing radial velocities of Gaia: a catalogue of Bayesian estimates for DR3

Authors: Aneesh P. Naik, Axel Widmark

arXiv: 2307.13398v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
11 pages, 9 figures (excluding appendices). Submitted to MNRAS. RV catalogues available for download at http://cuillin.roe.ac.uk/~anaik/MissingRVsDR3Catalogue . Source code, plotting scripts etc. accessible at https://github.com/aneeshnaik/MissingRVsDR3
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: In an earlier work, we demonstrated the effectiveness of Bayesian neural networks in estimating the missing line-of-sight velocities of Gaia stars, and published an accompanying catalogue of blind predictions for the line-of-sight velocities of stars in Gaia DR3. These were not merely point predictions, but probability distributions reflecting our state of knowledge about each star. Here, we verify that these predictions were highly accurate: the DR3 measurements were statistically consistent with our prediction distributions, with an approximate error rate of 1.5%. We use this same technique to produce a publicly available catalogue of predictive probability distributions for the 185 million stars up to a G-band magnitude of 17.5 still missing line-of-sight velocities in Gaia DR3. Validation tests demonstrate that the predictions are reliable for stars within approximately 7 kpc from the Sun and with distance precisions better than around 20%. For such stars, the typical prediction uncertainty is 25-30 km/s. We invite the community to use these radial velocities in analyses of stellar kinematics and dynamics, and give an example of such an application.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Jul. 2023

Explore the paper tree

Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant

Also access our AI generated Summaries, or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.