Exploring How Machine Learning Practitioners (Try To) Use Fairness Toolkits
Auteurs : Wesley Hanwen Deng, Manish Nagireddy, Michelle Seng Ah Lee, Jatinder Singh, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Kenneth Holstein, Haiyi Zhu
Résumé : Recent years have seen the development of many open-source ML fairness toolkits aimed at helping ML practitioners assess and address unfairness in their systems. However, there has been little research investigating how ML practitioners actually use these toolkits in practice. In this paper, we conducted the first in-depth empirical exploration of how industry practitioners (try to) work with existing fairness toolkits. In particular, we conducted think-aloud interviews to understand how participants learn about and use fairness toolkits, and explored the generality of our findings through an anonymous online survey. We identified several opportunities for fairness toolkits to better address practitioner needs and scaffold them in using toolkits effectively and responsibly. Based on these findings, we highlight implications for the design of future open-source fairness toolkits that can support practitioners in better contextualizing, communicating, and collaborating around ML fairness efforts.
Explorez l'arbre d'article
Cliquez sur les nœuds de l'arborescence pour être redirigé vers un article donné et accéder à leurs résumés et assistant virtuel
Recherchez des articles similaires (en version bêta)
En cliquant sur le bouton ci-dessus, notre algorithme compare le titre et le résumé de cet article à tous les articles de la même catégorie arXiv que nous avons résumés, et trouve les plus proches. Vous pouvez le relancer de temps en temps : les résultats s'améliorent à mesure que notre base grandit.