Breaking up the Magellanic Group into the Milky Way Halo: Understanding the Local Dwarf Galaxy Properties

AI-generated keywords: Numerical simulation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Elena D'Onghia and colleagues use numerical simulation to study Milky Way halo formation
  • Findings challenge traditional models of dwarf spheroidal galaxy (dSph) formation
  • Some dSphs may have formed independently from giant spirals and were already spheroids when accreted by a late infall group
  • Alternative perspective explains peculiarities observed in local dSphs
  • Simulations show Magellanic group undergoes tidal breakup before entering Milky Way halo
  • Only half of Magellanic satellites predicted to be within Milky Way's virial radius
  • Half of subhalos persist outside current virial radius as satellites, remaining material contributes to diffuse Milky Way halo
  • Less than 10% of disrupted group's mass estimated to contribute to Milky Way halo at present-day (z~0)
  • 20% of brightest dwarf galaxies believed to have originated from the disrupted group
  • Revised understanding sheds light on discrepancies in metallicity between stellar halo of our galaxy and its associated dwarf galaxies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Elena D'Onghia (University of Zurich)

arXiv: 0802.0302v2 - DOI (astro-ph)
ApJ Letter submitted. The title has been corrected

Abstract: We use a numerical simulation of a loose group containing a Milky Way halo to probe that in the hierarchical universe the Magellanic Clouds and some dSphs have been accreted into the Milky Way halo from a late infalling group of dwarfs. Our simulations show that the tidal breakup of the Magellanic group occurs before it enters the Milky Way halo. Only half of the satellites contributed from the group are predicted to be inside the Milky Way virial radius. Half of its subhalos survive outside the current virial radius in the form of satellites, whereas the remaining material contributes to the diffuse Milky Way halo. At z~0 the disrupted group contributes less than 10% to the Milky Way halo mass but 20% of the brightest dwarf galaxies of the Milky Way have been part of this group. This scenario points out that some dSphs might have been form away from giant spirals and been accreted already as spheroids, by a late infall group in contrast with the classical picture of tidal stripping of dSph formation models. This would naturally explain several peculiarities of the local dSph: why Draco and the other luminous dSphs exist compared to other ultra-faint satellite galaxies, the location of Tucana and Cetus in the outskirts of the Local Group and the mismatch in metallicity between the stellar halo of the Milky Way and the dwarf galaxies that many have suspected dissolved to build it.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Feb. 2008

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 0802.0302v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, Elena D'Onghia and colleagues utilize a numerical simulation to investigate the formation and evolution of the Milky Way halo in relation to the Magellanic Group. Their findings challenge traditional models of dwarf spheroidal galaxy (dSph) formation by suggesting that some dSphs may have formed independently from giant spirals and were already spheroids when accreted by a late infall group in the hierarchical structure of the universe. This alternative perspective sheds light on various peculiarities observed in local dSphs, such as why luminous dSphs like Draco exist alongside ultra-faint satellite galaxies, as well as explaining phenomena like Tucana and Cetus being located on the outskirts of our Local Group. The simulations reveal that the Magellanic group undergoes tidal breakup before entering the Milky Way halo, with only half of its satellites predicted to be within the Milky Way's virial radius. Furthermore, half of the subhalos from this group persist outside of the current virial radius as satellites, while the remaining material contributes to the diffuse Milky Way halo. At present-day (z~0), less than 10% of the mass of the disrupted group is estimated to contribute to the Milky Way halo, yet 20% of its brightest dwarf galaxies are believed to have originated from this group. This revised understanding also sheds light on discrepancies in metallicity between the stellar halo of our galaxy and its associated dwarf galaxies. By proposing a scenario where certain dSphs were accreted early on as spheroids rather than undergoing tidal stripping during their formation, researchers can better explain these observational inconsistencies and offer a more comprehensive explanation for how dwarf galaxies contribute to building up larger galactic structures like our own Milky Way.
Created on 17 Jan. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.