The Galaxy Content of SDSS Clusters and Groups

AI-generated keywords: Cluster Properties

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study uses imaging data from Sloan Digital Sky Survey and MaxBCG algorithm
  • Focus on relationship between cluster properties and luminosity of Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG)
  • Analysis conducted within redshift range of 0.1 < z < 0.3
  • Red and blue satellite galaxies show weak dependence on cluster richness in terms of luminosity function
  • Shape of satellite luminosity function remains constant for brighter magnitudes, but changes in mix of faint red and blue galaxies
  • Fraction of red satellites influenced by cluster-centric distance, galaxy luminosity, and cluster mass
  • Strong correlation between BCG luminosity and cluster richness
  • BCG luminosity follows Gaussian distribution with sigma_{log L} ~ 0.17 for massive clusters at fixed richness levels
  • Ratios of BCG luminosity to total cluster luminosity and characteristic satellite luminosity scale with cluster richness
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sarah M. Hansen, Erin S. Sheldon, Risa H. Wechsler, Benjamin P. Koester

Astrophys.J.699:1333-1353,2009
arXiv: 0710.3780v1 - DOI (astro-ph)
22 pages, 14 figures, submitted to ApJ

Abstract: Imaging data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey are used to characterize the population of galaxies in groups and clusters detected with the MaxBCG algorithm. We investigate the dependence of Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG) luminosity, and the distributions of satellite galaxy luminosity and satellite color, on cluster properties over the redshift range 0.1 < z < 0.3. The size of the dataset allows us to make measurements in many bins of cluster richness, radius and redshift. We find that, within r_200 of clusters with mass above 3e13 h-1 M_sun, the luminosity function of both red and blue satellites is only weakly dependent on richness. We further find that the shape of the satellite luminosity function does not depend on cluster-centric distance for magnitudes brighter than ^{0.25}M_i - 5log(h) < -19. However, the mix of faint red and blue galaxies changes dramatically. The satellite red fraction is dependent on cluster-centric distance, galaxy luminosity and cluster mass, and also increases by ~5% between redshifts 0.28 and 0.2, independent of richness. We find that BCG luminosity is tightly correlated with cluster richness, scaling as L_{BCG} ~ M_{200}^{0.3}, and has a Gaussian distribution at fixed richness, with sigma_{log L} ~ 0.17 for massive clusters. The ratios of BCG luminosity to total cluster luminosity and characteristic satellite luminosity scale strongly with cluster richness: in richer systems, BCGs contribute a smaller fraction of the total light, but are brighter compared to typical satellites. This study demonstrates the power of cross-correlation techniques for measuring galaxy populations in purely photometric data.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Oct. 2007

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 0710.3780v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study utilizes imaging data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to analyze the galaxy population in groups and clusters identified by the MaxBCG algorithm. The researchers focus on understanding the relationship between various cluster properties and the luminosity of the Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG), as well as the distribution of satellite galaxy luminosity and color. The analysis is conducted within a redshift range of 0.1 < z < 0.3, allowing for measurements across different cluster richness, radius, and redshift bins. The findings reveal that within a specific radius (r_200) of clusters with a mass above 3e13 h-1 M_sun, both red and blue satellite galaxies exhibit a weak dependence on cluster richness in terms of their luminosity function. Additionally, it is observed that the shape of the satellite luminosity function remains constant for magnitudes brighter than ^{0.25}M_i - 5log(h) < -19, but there are significant changes in the mix of faint red and blue galaxies. The fraction of red satellites is influenced by cluster-centric distance, galaxy luminosity, and cluster mass, increasing by approximately 5% between redshifts 0.28 and 0.2 regardless of richness. Furthermore, a strong correlation is identified between BCG luminosity and cluster richness, with BCGs scaling as L_{BCG} ~ M_{200}^{0.3}. At fixed richness levels, BCG luminosity follows a Gaussian distribution with sigma_{log L} ~ 0.17 for massive clusters. The ratios of BCG luminosity to total cluster luminosity and characteristic satellite luminosity also show strong scaling with cluster richness: richer systems have BCGs that contribute less light to total light but are brighter compared to typical satellites. Overall, this study highlights how cross-correlation techniques can be used to analyze galaxy populations solely based on photometric data; providing valuable insights into the relationship between cluster properties and the luminosity and color distribution of galaxies within them which contributes to our understanding of galaxy evolution in different environments.
Created on 01 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.