Using survival curves for comparison of ordinal qualitative data in clinical studies
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The article proposes the use of survival analysis as an alternative non-parametric approach for comparing ordinal qualitative data.
- Two case studies are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method.
- The first case study involves a clinical trial investigating the safety and efficacy of silymarin/metionin for chronic hepatitis C, which showed no significant difference between treatments.
- The second case study is a prospective study to identify gustatory alterations due to chorda tympani nerve involvement in patients with chronic otitis media without prior surgery, which revealed a significant association between healthy and affected sides of the face (p < 0.05).
- This method offers an effective procedure for comparing samples from ordinal qualitative variables which may be more familiar to clinical researchers than traditional statistical tests.
- This approach has potential applications in various fields where ordinal qualitative data is prevalent such as psychology and social sciences.
Authors: B. de B. Pereira, E. M. Nascimento, F. Felix, G. F. M. Rezende
Abstract: Background and Objective: The survival-agreement plot was proposed and improved to assess the reliability of a quantitative measure. We propose the use of survival analysis as an alternative non-parametric approach for comparison of ordinal qualitative data. Study Design and Setting: Two case studies were presented. The first one is related to a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of silymarin/metionin for chronic hepatitis C. The second one is a prospective study to identify gustatory alterations due to chorda tympani nerve involvement in patients with chronic otitis media without prior surgery. Results: No significant difference was detected between the two treatments related to the chronic hepatitis C (p > 0.5). On the other hand, a significant association was observed between the healthy side and the affected side of the face of patients with chronic otitis media related to gustatory alterations (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The proposed method can serve as an alternative procedure to statistical test for comparison of samples from ordinal qualitative variables. This approach has the advantage of being more familiar to clinical researchers.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.