Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1901.02957v2

The paper "Decision-Making Under Uncertainty in Research Synthesis: Designing for the Garden of Forking Paths" by Alex Kale, Matthew Kay, and Jessica Hullman explores the challenges researchers face when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to make evidence-based recommendations to decision-makers. The authors argue that researchers must navigate a garden of forking paths, which refers to a series of analytical decision-points that have the potential to influence findings. To identify challenges and opportunities related to designing systems that help researchers manage uncertainty around which of multiple analyses is best, the authors interviewed 11 professional researchers who conduct research synthesis to inform decision-making within three organizations. Through a qualitative analysis, the authors identified 480 analytical decisions made by researchers throughout the scientific process. They present detailed descriptions of current practices in applied research synthesis and corresponding design challenges. These include making it more feasible for researchers to try different analyses and compare their results; shifting researchers' focus from rationales for decisions to impacts on outcomes; and supporting communication techniques that acknowledge decision-makers' reluctance towards uncertainty. The authors also identify opportunities to design systems that can help researchers explore, reason about, and communicate uncertainty in decision-making about possible analyses in research synthesis. This includes developing tools that allow for easy comparison between different analytical approaches as well as highlighting how different decisions affect results. Ultimately, this paper emphasizes the importance of managing uncertainty in research synthesis and provides insights into how designers can support researchers in making informed decisions when navigating complex analytical landscapes.

• - Researchers conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses face challenges in making evidence-based recommendations to decision-makers
• - Researchers must navigate a garden of forking paths, which refers to a series of analytical decision-points that have the potential to influence findings
• - The authors interviewed 11 professional researchers who conduct research synthesis to inform decision-making within three organizations
• - Through a qualitative analysis, the authors identified 480 analytical decisions made by researchers throughout the scientific process
• - Current practices in applied research synthesis present design challenges such as making it more feasible for researchers to try different analyses and compare their results; shifting researchers' focus from rationales for decisions to impacts on outcomes; and supporting communication techniques that acknowledge decision-makers' reluctance towards uncertainty
• - Opportunities exist to design systems that can help researchers explore, reason about, and communicate uncertainty in decision-making about possible analyses in research synthesis. This includes developing tools that allow for easy comparison between different analytical approaches as well as highlighting how different decisions affect results.
• - Managing uncertainty in research synthesis is important and designers can support researchers in making informed decisions when navigating complex analytical landscapes.

Summary: Researchers who study and analyze information face challenges in making recommendations to people who make important decisions. They have to make many choices that can affect their findings. Some researchers were interviewed about how they do this work, and it was found that they make a lot of decisions throughout the process. There are some problems with the way research is done now, but there are ways to design systems that can help researchers explore different options and communicate better. Definitions: - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A type of research where scientists look at all the studies on a certain topic and try to find patterns or conclusions. - Evidence-based recommendations: Suggestions for what people should do based on scientific evidence. - Analytical decision-points: Places where researchers have to choose between different options when analyzing data. - Qualitative analysis: A way of looking at data that focuses on understanding meaning instead of numbers. - Uncertainty: When something is not completely known or understood.

Navigating the Garden of Forking Paths: Decision-Making Under Uncertainty in Research Synthesis

Research synthesis is an important tool for making evidence-based decisions. It involves combining and analyzing data from multiple sources to draw conclusions about a particular topic or issue. However, conducting research synthesis is not without its challenges. In their paper “Decision-Making Under Uncertainty in Research Synthesis: Designing for the Garden of Forking Paths”, Alex Kale, Matthew Kay, and Jessica Hullman explore how researchers must navigate a garden of forking paths when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to make informed decisions.

The Challenges of Research Synthesis

Kale et al. argue that researchers must navigate a garden of forking paths when conducting research synthesis – referring to a series of analytical decision points that have the potential to influence findings. To identify challenges and opportunities related to designing systems that help researchers manage uncertainty around which analysis is best suited for their needs, the authors interviewed 11 professional researchers who conduct research synthesis within three organizations. Through qualitative analysis, they identified 480 analytical decisions made by these researchers throughout the scientific process. The authors present detailed descriptions of current practices in applied research synthesis as well as corresponding design challenges faced by those who conduct such analyses. These include making it more feasible for researchers to try different analyses and compare their results; shifting focus from rationales behind each decision point to impacts on outcomes; and supporting communication techniques that acknowledge decision makers’ reluctance towards uncertainty when presented with multiple options or results.

Design Opportunities

In addition, Kale et al also identify opportunities to design systems that can help researchers explore, reason about, and communicate uncertainty in decision-making about possible analyses in research synthesis. This includes developing tools that allow easy comparison between different analytical approaches as well as highlighting how different decisions affect results obtained from such analyses. Ultimately, this paper emphasizes the importance of managing uncertainty in research synthesis and provides insights into how designers can support researchers in making informed decisions when navigating complex analytical landscapes with multiple options available at each step along the way..