Killing of targets by effector CD8$^+$T cells in the mouse spleen follows the law of mass action
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study by Ganusov, Barber, and De Boer focuses on challenges in measuring efficacy of T cell-based vaccines and correlating CD8$^+$T cell responses with protection against viral infections.
- Researchers investigate in vivo efficacy of CD8$^+$T cells by studying killing peptide-pulsed targets by effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells specific to three epitopes of LCMV in mouse spleen.
- Effector CD8$^+$T cells follow the law of mass-action, where death rate of peptide-pulsed targets is directly proportional to frequency of CTLs in spleen; memory CD8$^+$T cells do not adhere to this law as their killing efficiency saturates at high frequencies.
- No evidence found supporting decrease in target cell death rate with increasing target cell density for both effector and memory cells.
- At low frequencies, effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells are equally efficient at killing peptide-pulsed targets on a per capita basis.
- Findings provide insights for calculating level of memory CD8$^+$T cells needed for sterilizing protection against viral infections; offer quantitative understanding of how T cell responses eliminate virus-infected cells and correlate vaccine-induced memory CD8$^+$T cell phenotypes with killing efficacy in vivo.
Authors: Vitaly V. Ganusov, Daniel L. Barber, Rob J. De Boer
Abstract: It has been difficult to measure efficacy of T cell-based vaccines and to correlate efficacy of CD8$^+$T cell responses with protection against viral infections. In part, this difficulty is due to our poor understanding of the in vivo efficacy of CD8$^+$T cells. Using a recently developed experimental method of in vivo cytotoxicity we investigated quantitative aspects of killing of peptide-pulsed targets by effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells, specific to three epitopes of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), in the mouse spleen. By analyzing data on killing of targets with varying number of epitope-specific effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells, we find that killing of targets by effectors follows the law of mass-action, that is the death rate of peptide-pulsed targets is proportional to the frequency of CTLs in the spleen. In contrast, killing of targets by memory CD8$^+$T cells does not follow the mass action law because the death rate of targets saturates at high frequencies of memory CD8$^+$T cells. For both effector and memory cells, we also find no support for a killing term that includes the decrease of the death rate of targets with increasing target cell density. Importantly, we find that at low CD8$^+$T cell frequencies, effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells on the per capita basis are equally efficient at killing peptide-pulsed targets. Our framework provides the guideline for the calculation of the level of memory CD8$^+$T cells required to provide sterilizing protection against viral infection. Our results thus form a basis for quantitative understanding of the process of killing of virus-infected cells by T cell responses in tissues and can be used to correlate the phenotype of vaccine-induced memory CD8 T cells with their killing efficacy in vivo.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.