Killing of targets by effector CD8$^+$T cells in the mouse spleen follows the law of mass action

AI-generated keywords: T cell-based vaccines CD8$^+$T cells viral infections in vivo cytotoxicity memory CD8$^+$T cells

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by Ganusov, Barber, and De Boer focuses on challenges in measuring efficacy of T cell-based vaccines and correlating CD8$^+$T cell responses with protection against viral infections.
  • Researchers investigate in vivo efficacy of CD8$^+$T cells by studying killing peptide-pulsed targets by effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells specific to three epitopes of LCMV in mouse spleen.
  • Effector CD8$^+$T cells follow the law of mass-action, where death rate of peptide-pulsed targets is directly proportional to frequency of CTLs in spleen; memory CD8$^+$T cells do not adhere to this law as their killing efficiency saturates at high frequencies.
  • No evidence found supporting decrease in target cell death rate with increasing target cell density for both effector and memory cells.
  • At low frequencies, effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells are equally efficient at killing peptide-pulsed targets on a per capita basis.
  • Findings provide insights for calculating level of memory CD8$^+$T cells needed for sterilizing protection against viral infections; offer quantitative understanding of how T cell responses eliminate virus-infected cells and correlate vaccine-induced memory CD8$^+$T cell phenotypes with killing efficacy in vivo.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Vitaly V. Ganusov, Daniel L. Barber, Rob J. De Boer

arXiv: 0905.1718v1 - DOI (q-bio.QM)

Abstract: It has been difficult to measure efficacy of T cell-based vaccines and to correlate efficacy of CD8$^+$T cell responses with protection against viral infections. In part, this difficulty is due to our poor understanding of the in vivo efficacy of CD8$^+$T cells. Using a recently developed experimental method of in vivo cytotoxicity we investigated quantitative aspects of killing of peptide-pulsed targets by effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells, specific to three epitopes of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), in the mouse spleen. By analyzing data on killing of targets with varying number of epitope-specific effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells, we find that killing of targets by effectors follows the law of mass-action, that is the death rate of peptide-pulsed targets is proportional to the frequency of CTLs in the spleen. In contrast, killing of targets by memory CD8$^+$T cells does not follow the mass action law because the death rate of targets saturates at high frequencies of memory CD8$^+$T cells. For both effector and memory cells, we also find no support for a killing term that includes the decrease of the death rate of targets with increasing target cell density. Importantly, we find that at low CD8$^+$T cell frequencies, effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells on the per capita basis are equally efficient at killing peptide-pulsed targets. Our framework provides the guideline for the calculation of the level of memory CD8$^+$T cells required to provide sterilizing protection against viral infection. Our results thus form a basis for quantitative understanding of the process of killing of virus-infected cells by T cell responses in tissues and can be used to correlate the phenotype of vaccine-induced memory CD8 T cells with their killing efficacy in vivo.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 May. 2009

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 0905.1718v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, Vitaly V. Ganusov, Daniel L. Barber, and Rob J. De Boer address the challenges in measuring the efficacy of T cell-based vaccines and correlating CD8$^+$T cell responses with protection against viral infections. The researchers focus on understanding the in vivo efficacy of CD8$^+$T cells by investigating the quantitative aspects of killing peptide-pulsed targets by effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells specific to three epitopes of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) in the mouse spleen. Through their experimental method of in vivo cytotoxicity, the team analyzed data on killing targets with varying numbers of epitope-specific effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells. They discovered that effector CD8$^+$T cells follow the law of mass-action, where the death rate of peptide-pulsed targets is directly proportional to the frequency of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in the spleen. In contrast, memory CD8$^+$T cells do not adhere to this mass action law as their killing efficiency saturates at high frequencies. Furthermore, the researchers found no evidence supporting a decrease in target cell death rate with increasing target cell density for both effector and memory cells. Interestingly, they observed that at low frequencies, effector and memory CD8$^+$T cells are equally efficient at killing peptide-pulsed targets on a per capita basis. The findings from this study provide valuable insights for calculating the level of memory CD8$^+$T cells necessary to confer sterilizing protection against viral infections. This framework offers a quantitative understanding of how T cell responses eliminate virus-infected cells in tissues and can be utilized to correlate vaccine-induced memory CD8$^+$T cell phenotypes with their killing efficacy in vivo. Overall, this research contributes to advancing our knowledge of T cell-mediated immunity and its implications for vaccine development against viral diseases.
Created on 19 May. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.