No More Pesky Learning Rates

AI-generated keywords: Learning rates Stochastic gradient descent Optimization techniques Deep learning models Automated approach

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Tom Schaul, Sixin Zhang, and Yann LeCun address tuning learning rates in stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms.
  • Performance of SGD heavily relies on adjusting and decreasing learning rates over time.
  • Proposed novel method automatically adjusts multiple learning rates to minimize expected error by leveraging local gradient variations.
  • Experimentation shows algorithm achieves performance comparable to exhaustive systematic search for optimal settings.
  • Eliminates need for manual tuning of learning rates, saving time and effort for practitioners.
  • Implications for machine learning researchers and practitioners working with SGD include more efficient and automated adjustments.
  • Innovative approach opens up new possibilities for improving model training efficiency and effectiveness in various applications.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tom Schaul, Sixin Zhang, Yann LeCun

arXiv: 1206.1106v1 - DOI (stat.ML)
Submitted to NIPS 2012

Abstract: The performance of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) depends critically on how learning rates are tuned and decreased over time. We propose a method to automatically adjust multiple learning rates so as to minimize the expected error at any one time. The method relies on local gradient variations across samples. Using a number of convex and non-convex learning tasks, we show that the resulting algorithm matches the performance of the best settings obtained through systematic search, and effectively removes the need for learning rate tuning.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2012

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1206.1106v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "No More Pesky Learning Rates," authors Tom Schaul, Sixin Zhang, and Yann LeCun address the critical issue of tuning learning rates in stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. The performance of SGD heavily relies on how learning rates are adjusted and decreased over time. To tackle this challenge, the authors propose a novel method that automatically adjusts multiple learning rates to minimize the expected error at any given time. This leverages local gradient variations across samples to make informed decisions about updating learning rates. Through experimentation on a variety of convex and non-convex learning tasks, the authors demonstrate that their proposed algorithm achieves performance levels comparable to those obtained through exhaustive systematic search for optimal settings. Importantly, this effectively eliminates the need for manual tuning of learning rates, streamlining the optimization process and potentially saving significant time and effort for practitioners in the field. The findings presented in this paper have important implications for machine learning researchers and practitioners working with SGD . By offering a more efficient and automated way to adjust , this work contributes to advancing the state-of-the-art in . The authors' innovative approach opens up new possibilities for improving model training efficiency and effectiveness in various applications across different domains.
Created on 19 Feb. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.