SARCS strong-lensing galaxy groups: II - mass-concentration relation and strong-lensing bias

AI-generated keywords: Gravitational Lensing Mass-Concentration Relation Triaxial Haloes Strong-Lensing Bias Foëx et al.

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study focuses on analysis of 80 strong-lensing galaxy groups using stacked weak-lensing techniques
  • Objective is to investigate mass-concentration relation and strong-lensing bias in these systems
  • Observed lensing signal compared with singular isothermal sphere (SIS) and Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) models, neither can be firmly rejected based on lensing signal alone
  • Average concentration parameter (c200) derived, value significantly higher than predicted by numerical simulations for corresponding average mass (M200)
  • Mass-concentration relation (c(M)) established, spanning nearly two decades in mass, slope disagrees with predictions from simulations using unbiased populations of dark matter haloes
  • Authors propose that triaxial haloes preferentially aligned with line of sight could account for observed large concentrations in strong lenses compared to non-lensing haloes
  • More massive systems may not require significant elongation along line of sight due to their already large lensing cross sections
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: G. Foëx, V. Motta, E. Jullo, M. Limousin, T. Verdugo

A&A 572, A19 (2014)
arXiv: 1409.5905v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)

Abstract: Our work is based on the stacked weak-lensing analysis of a sample of 80 strong-lensing galaxy groups. Our main results are the following: (i) the lensing signal does not allow us to firmly reject a simple singular isothermal sphere mass distribution compared to the expected NFW mass profile; (ii) we obtain an average concentration $c_{200}=8.6_{-1.3}^{+2.1}$ that is much higher than the expected value from numerical simulations for the corresponding average mass $M_{200}=0.73_{-0.10}^{+0.11}\times10^{14}\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$; (iii) the combination of our results with those at larger mass scales gives a mass-concentration relation $c(M)$ over nearly two decades in mass, with a slope in disagreement with predictions from numerical simulations using unbiased populations of dark matter haloes; (iv) our combined $c(M)$ relation matches results from simulations using only haloes with a large strong-lensing cross section, i.e. elongated with a major axis close to the line of sight; (v) for the simplest case of prolate haloes, we estimate with a toy model a lower limit on the minor:major axis ratio $a/c=0.5$ for the average SARCS galaxy group. Our analysis based on galaxy groups confirmed the results obtained at larger mass scales: strong lenses present apparently too large concentrations, which can be explained by triaxial haloes preferentially oriented with the line of sight. Because more massive systems already have large lensing cross sections, they do not require a large elongation along the line of sight, contrary to less massive galaxy groups. Therefore, it is natural to observe larger lensing (projected) concentrations for such systems, resulting in an overall mass-concentration relation steeper than that of non-lensing haloes.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Sep. 2014

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1409.5905v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study conducted by Foëx et al. focuses on the analysis of a sample of 80 strong-lensing galaxy groups using stacked weak-lensing techniques. The main objective is to investigate the mass-concentration relation and strong-lensing bias in these systems. The authors first compare the observed lensing signal with two different mass distribution models: a simple singular isothermal sphere (SIS) and the expected Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile. The results show that neither model can be firmly rejected based on the lensing signal alone. Next, the study derives the average concentration parameter, denoted as c200, which characterizes the density profile of dark matter haloes. The obtained value, c200 = 8.6_{-1.3}^{+2.1}, is significantly higher than what is predicted by numerical simulations for the corresponding average mass, M200 = 0.73_{-0.10}^{+0.11} x 10^14 solar masses. Furthermore, combining their findings with previous results at larger mass scales, Foëx et al. establish a mass-concentration relation, denoted as c(M), spanning nearly two decades in mass. Surprisingly, this relation exhibits a slope that disagrees with predictions from simulations using unbiased populations of dark matter haloes. To explain these discrepancies, the authors propose that triaxial haloes preferentially aligned with the line of sight could account for the observed large concentrations in strong lenses compared to non-lensing haloes. They suggest that more massive systems do not require significant elongation along the line of sight due to their already large lensing cross sections. Finally, Foëx et al.
Created on 05 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.