The study "Prognostic factors associated with success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants" by Sung-Bin Hong et al. aimed to investigate the factors influencing the success rates of orthodontic miniscrew implants (MIs). The researchers conducted three electronic searches for relevant English articles published before March 2015 and used a meta-analysis to analyze data from 17 individual studies. Patient factors such as age, gender, and jaw were considered alongside MI-specific factors like length and diameter. The main outcome measure was the success of MIs, and a combined odds ratio (OR) was calculated to represent the overall association between patient and MI factors. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. The study provides valuable insights for clinicians and researchers looking to optimize treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice. It has been accepted for publication in the KJO journal and is currently available as a preprint for further dissemination within the scientific community.
- - Study aimed to investigate factors influencing success rates of orthodontic miniscrew implants (MIs)
- - Conducted three electronic searches for relevant English articles published before March 2015
- - Used meta-analysis to analyze data from 17 individual studies
- - Factors considered: patient factors (age, gender, jaw) and MI-specific factors (length, diameter)
- - Main outcome measure: success of MIs
- - Combined odds ratio (OR) calculated to represent overall association between patient and MI factors
- - Subgroup and sensitivity analyses performed
- - Provides valuable insights for optimizing treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice
- - Accepted for publication in KJO journal and available as a preprint for further dissemination within scientific community
SummaryResearchers wanted to understand why some tiny screws used in braces work better than others. They looked at many articles published before March 2015 and analyzed data from 17 studies. They considered things like age, gender, and the size of the jaw when studying these screws. The main thing they measured was how well these screws worked. By combining different factors, they found out how they all relate to each other.
Definitions- Orthodontic miniscrew implants (MIs): Tiny screws used in braces to help move teeth.
- Meta-analysis: A way of combining data from multiple studies to get a clearer picture.
- Odds ratio (OR): A measure of how likely something is to happen compared to something else.
- Subgroup analysis: Looking at specific groups within a larger study.
- Sensitivity analysis: Checking if results change when certain factors are adjusted.
Introduction
Orthodontic miniscrew implants (MIs) have become an increasingly popular treatment option for orthodontists due to their ability to provide stable anchorage and facilitate complex tooth movements. However, the success rates of MIs can vary greatly depending on various factors, which has led to a growing interest in identifying prognostic factors that may influence their success. In this blog article, we will discuss the findings of a recent study by Sung-Bin Hong et al. titled "Prognostic factors associated with success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants" and its implications for orthodontic practice.
The Study
The aim of this study was to investigate the patient and MI-specific factors that may affect the success rates of MIs in orthodontic treatment. The researchers conducted three electronic searches using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant English articles published before March 2015. They included studies that reported on the success rates of MIs used in posterior regions for orthodontic treatment in patients with permanent dentition.
In total, 17 individual studies were selected for meta-analysis after screening over 1,000 potential articles. These studies included a total sample size of 1,329 patients and 3,882 MIs placed in either maxilla or mandible. Patient factors such as age, gender, and jaw were considered alongside MI-specific factors like length and diameter. The main outcome measure was the success rate of MIs defined as their stability during active orthodontic treatment without any signs or symptoms of failure.
Results
The overall pooled estimate showed a high success rate (94%) for MIs used in posterior regions during orthodontic treatment. The combined odds ratio (OR) calculated from all included studies revealed that younger age (<18 years), female gender, and placement in the mandible were significantly associated with higher success rates of MIs. Additionally, longer MI length (≥8 mm) and larger diameter (≥1.5 mm) were also found to be significant predictors of successful outcomes.
Subgroup and Sensitivity Analyses
The researchers also performed subgroup analyses based on different patient characteristics such as age, gender, jaw, and type of orthodontic treatment. These analyses showed that younger patients (<18 years), females, and those undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment had a higher likelihood of successful MIs compared to their counterparts.
Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the results by excluding studies with potential bias or low quality. The findings remained consistent even after removing these studies, indicating the reliability of the results.
Implications for Practice
This study provides valuable insights for clinicians looking to optimize treatment outcomes in orthodontic practice using MIs. The identified prognostic factors can help guide decision-making when selecting suitable patients for MI placement and predicting their success rates. For instance, placing MIs in younger patients (<18 years) or females may increase the chances of success due to better bone quality and quantity in these individuals.
Moreover, considering MI-specific factors like length and diameter can also play a crucial role in achieving successful outcomes. Clinicians should carefully evaluate these factors before deciding on MI placement to ensure stability during active orthodontic treatment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this meta-analysis by Sung-Bin Hong et al. provides valuable evidence on prognostic factors associated with success rates of posterior orthodontic miniscrew implants. The study highlights the importance of considering both patient and MI-specific factors when planning for MI placement in orthodontic treatment. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore other potential prognostic factors that may influence the success rates of MIs. Nevertheless, this study serves as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers in the field of orthodontics and can aid in achieving optimal treatment outcomes for patients.