Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1602.02238v1

The rise of sharing economy platforms has transformed the way we travel, commute, and borrow. However, despite their popularity among consumers, such companies are often poorly regulated. Airbnb, one of the most successful examples of a sharing economy platform, has faced criticism from regulators and policymakers for its lack of regulation. While municipalities should regulate the emergence of Airbnb through evidence-based policy making, in practice they often engage in a false dichotomy: some allow the business without imposing any regulation while others ban it altogether due to a lack of evidence upon which to draft policies. To address this issue, researchers Giovanni Quattrone, Davide Proserpio, Daniele Quercia, Licia Capra and Mirco Musolesi propose gathering evidence from the web to determine where and when Airbnb listings are offered and match this information with census and hotel data to determine the socio-economic conditions of areas that benefit from the hospitality platform. Their analysis reveals that traditional regulations have not been able to respond to changes in Airbnb demand and offering over time. The authors' study provides insights into who benefits from Airbnb's services in London by analyzing data on listings alongside census and hotel data. The findings reveal that areas with higher levels of deprivation tend to have more affordable listings on Airbnb compared to wealthier areas where prices are higher. The study also highlights how traditional regulations have failed to keep up with changes in demand for Airbnb services over time. Overall, this research demonstrates how algorithmic regulation can be used as an effective tool for regulating sharing economy platforms like Airbnb by providing real-time responses based on data analysis rather than relying solely on traditional regulatory approaches that may not be responsive enough or flexible enough to adapt quickly enough as markets change over time.

• - Sharing economy platforms have transformed the way we travel, commute, and borrow
• - Such companies are often poorly regulated despite their popularity among consumers
• - Airbnb has faced criticism from regulators and policymakers for its lack of regulation
• - Municipalities engage in a false dichotomy: some allow the business without imposing any regulation while others ban it altogether due to a lack of evidence upon which to draft policies
• - Researchers propose gathering evidence from the web to determine where and when Airbnb listings are offered and match this information with census and hotel data to determine the socio-economic conditions of areas that benefit from the hospitality platform
• - Traditional regulations have not been able to respond to changes in Airbnb demand and offering over time
• - Areas with higher levels of deprivation tend to have more affordable listings on Airbnb compared to wealthier areas where prices are higher
• - Algorithmic regulation can be used as an effective tool for regulating sharing economy platforms like Airbnb by providing real-time responses based on data analysis

Summary: Sharing economy platforms like Airbnb have changed the way we travel and borrow things. However, they are not always regulated well, which means some people don't like them. Some places allow Airbnb without rules, while others ban it completely because they don't know how to make rules for it. Researchers want to use information from the internet to see how Airbnb affects different areas. They also found that poorer areas have cheaper listings on Airbnb than richer areas. Definitions: - Sharing economy platforms: websites or apps where people can share things with each other (like renting out a room on Airbnb) - Regulated: when there are rules in place to control something - Criticism: when people say bad things about something - Municipalities: local governments that run towns or cities - Evidence: information that helps you understand something better - Census data: information collected by the government about who lives in an area - Socio-economic conditions: how rich or poor an area is and what kind of jobs people have - Algorithmic regulation: using computer programs to help make rules for something

The Rise of Sharing Economy Platforms and the Need for Algorithmic Regulation

In recent years, sharing economy platforms like Airbnb have transformed the way we travel, commute, and borrow. These services offer a convenient and cost-effective alternative to traditional hospitality services such as hotels. However, despite their popularity among consumers, these companies are often poorly regulated by municipalities due to a lack of evidence upon which to draft policies. To address this issue, researchers Giovanni Quattrone, Davide Proserpio, Daniele Quercia, Licia Capra and Mirco Musolesi propose gathering evidence from the web to determine where and when Airbnb listings are offered and match this information with census and hotel data in order to determine the socio-economic conditions of areas that benefit from the hospitality platform. Their analysis reveals that traditional regulations have not been able to respond quickly enough or flexibly enough as markets change over time.

Evidence-Based Policy Making: An Analysis of Airbnb Listings in London

The authors' study provides insights into who benefits from Airbnb's services in London by analyzing data on listings alongside census and hotel data. The findings reveal that areas with higher levels of deprivation tend to have more affordable listings on Airbnb compared to wealthier areas where prices are higher. This suggests that while traditional regulations may be unable to keep up with changes in demand for Airbnb services over time, algorithmic regulation can provide real-time responses based on data analysis rather than relying solely on traditional regulatory approaches.

Conclusion

Overall, this research demonstrates how algorithmic regulation can be used as an effective tool for regulating sharing economy platforms like Airbnb by providing real-time responses based on data analysis rather than relying solely on traditional regulatory approaches that may not be responsive enough or flexible enough to adapt quickly enough as markets change over time.