"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier

AI-generated keywords: Trust

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Machine learning models are often considered black boxes, leading to a lack of trust in their predictions.
  • Understanding the rationale behind predictions is crucial for establishing trust and making informed decisions.
  • LIME is introduced as a novel explanation technique to elucidate predictions of any classifier in an interpretable manner by constructing local interpretable models around each prediction.
  • The authors propose a method for explaining models by showcasing representative individual predictions along with explanations in a non-redundant way, treating it as a submodular optimization problem.
  • Experiments demonstrate the flexibility and applicability of these methods across different types of models for text and image classification.
  • The utility of explanations is highlighted through scenarios like deciding whether to trust a prediction, selecting between models, improving an unreliable classifier, and identifying reasons why a classifier should not be trusted.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, Carlos Guestrin

Abstract: Despite widespread adoption, machine learning models remain mostly black boxes. Understanding the reasons behind predictions is, however, quite important in assessing trust, which is fundamental if one plans to take action based on a prediction, or when choosing whether to deploy a new model. Such understanding also provides insights into the model, which can be used to transform an untrustworthy model or prediction into a trustworthy one. In this work, we propose LIME, a novel explanation technique that explains the predictions of any classifier in an interpretable and faithful manner, by learning an interpretable model locally around the prediction. We also propose a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem. We demonstrate the flexibility of these methods by explaining different models for text (e.g. random forests) and image classification (e.g. neural networks). We show the utility of explanations via novel experiments, both simulated and with human subjects, on various scenarios that require trust: deciding if one should trust a prediction, choosing between models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and identifying why a classifier should not be trusted.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Feb. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1602.04938v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

, , , , In the paper titled "Why Should I Trust You? ": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier, authors Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin address the issue of machine learning models being predominantly black boxes despite their widespread adoption. They highlight the importance of understanding the rationale behind predictions to establish trust, especially when making decisions based on these predictions or considering deploying a new model. The authors emphasize that gaining insights into the model can help convert an untrustworthy prediction or model into a reliable one. To tackle this challenge, the authors introduce LIME, a novel explanation technique designed to elucidate the predictions of any classifier in an interpretable and faithful manner. This is achieved by constructing an interpretable model locally around each prediction. Additionally, they propose a method for explaining models by showcasing representative individual predictions along with their explanations in a non-redundant manner, framing this task as a submodular optimization problem. The flexibility and applicability of these methods are demonstrated through experiments involving different types of models for text (such as random forests) and image classification (like neural networks). The utility of explanations is showcased through various scenarios that necessitate trust, including determining whether to trust a prediction, selecting between models, enhancing an unreliable classifier, and pinpointing reasons why a classifier should not be trusted. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights and practical techniques for interpreting machine learning models' predictions in order to foster trust and enable informed decision-making in diverse applications.
Created on 17 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.