Providing Assurance and Scrutability on Shared Data and Machine Learning Models with Verifiable Credentials

AI-generated keywords: Trust Assurance Transparency Verifiable Credentials AI Scrutineer

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper introduces a software architecture and implementation to address trust in shared data resources for AI systems and ML models.
  • Practitioners in fields like healthcare and finance often lack insight into potential problems with adopted datasets.
  • The authors propose a system based on self-sovereign identity design patterns.
  • Scientists can issue signed credentials attesting to the qualities of their data resources, recorded in a bill of materials (BOM).
  • The BOM is stored with the ML model as a verifiable credential, providing traceable record of its supply chain.
  • An AI Scrutineer tool utilizes the verified BOM and certified data qualities to provide practitioners with insights into model constituents.
  • The approach leverages self-sovereign identity principles and verifiable credentials to enhance trust and transparency in shared data resources for AI systems and ML models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Iain Barclay, Alun Preece, Ian Taylor, Swapna K. Radha, Jarek Nabrzyski

This is the submitted, pre-peer reviewed version of this paper

Abstract: Adopting shared data resources requires scientists to place trust in the originators of the data. When shared data is later used in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems or machine learning (ML) models, the trust lineage extends to the users of the system, typically practitioners in fields such as healthcare and finance. Practitioners rely on AI developers to have used relevant, trustworthy data, but may have limited insight and recourse. This paper introduces a software architecture and implementation of a system based on design patterns from the field of self-sovereign identity. Scientists can issue signed credentials attesting to qualities of their data resources. Data contributions to ML models are recorded in a bill of materials (BOM), which is stored with the model as a verifiable credential. The BOM provides a traceable record of the supply chain for an AI system, which facilitates on-going scrutiny of the qualities of the contributing components. The verified BOM, and its linkage to certified data qualities, is used in the AI Scrutineer, a web-based tool designed to offer practitioners insight into ML model constituents and highlight any problems with adopted datasets, should they be found to have biased data or be otherwise discredited.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 May. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2105.06370v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Providing Assurance and Scrutinability on Shared Data and Machine Learning Models with Verifiable Credentials" introduces a software architecture and implementation that addresses the issue of trust in shared data resources used in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems or machine learning (ML) models. The trust placed in the originators of the data extends to practitioners in fields like healthcare and finance who rely on AI developers to have used relevant and trustworthy data. However, these practitioners often lack insight into potential problems that may arise from adopted datasets such as biased data or discredited sources. To address this challenge, the authors propose a system based on design patterns from the field of self-sovereign identity. Scientists can issue signed credentials attesting to the qualities of their data resources which are then recorded in a bill of materials (BOM). This BOM is stored with the ML model as a verifiable credential providing traceable record of its supply chain for an AI system. The verified BOM along with its linkage to certified data qualities is utilized by an AI Scrutineer; a web-based tool designed to provide practitioners with insight into model constituents. Overall, this paper presents an innovative approach to enhance trust and transparency in shared data resources used for AI systems and ML models by leveraging self-sovereign identity principles and verifiable credentials. Scientists can provide assurance regarding their data's quality while practitioners gain valuable insights into model constituents through tools like AI Scrutineer.
Created on 06 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.