Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Recent progress in AI has sparked interest in developing machines that can learn and think like humans
  • Deep neural networks have been used to train machines in various tasks, achieving remarkable performance
  • AI systems still differ significantly from human intelligence despite their achievements and biological inspiration
  • To create truly human-like machines, it is necessary to go beyond current engineering trends
  • Machines should build causal models of the world to support explanation and understanding
  • Grounding learning in intuitive theories of physics and psychology enhances overall knowledge base
  • Harnessing compositionality and learning-to-learn techniques enables rapid acquisition and generalization of knowledge
  • Combining recent advances in neural network technology with structured cognitive models can leverage strengths of both approaches.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Brenden M. Lake, Tomer D. Ullman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Samuel J. Gershman

Abstract: Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has renewed interest in building systems that learn and think like people. Many advances have come from using deep neural networks trained end-to-end in tasks such as object recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or even beats humans in some respects. Despite their biological inspiration and performance achievements, these systems differ from human intelligence in crucial ways. We review progress in cognitive science suggesting that truly human-like learning and thinking machines will have to reach beyond current engineering trends in both what they learn, and how they learn it. Specifically, we argue that these machines should (a) build causal models of the world that support explanation and understanding, rather than merely solving pattern recognition problems; (b) ground learning in intuitive theories of physics and psychology, to support and enrich the knowledge that is learned; and (c) harness compositionality and learning-to-learn to rapidly acquire and generalize knowledge to new tasks and situations. We suggest concrete challenges and promising routes towards these goals that can combine the strengths of recent neural network advances with more structured cognitive models.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Apr. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1604.00289v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recent progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) has sparked a renewed interest in developing machines that can learn and think like humans. This progress has been driven by the use of deep neural networks, which have been trained end-to-end in various tasks such as object recognition, video games, and board games. These systems have achieved remarkable performance, sometimes even surpassing human capabilities. However, despite their impressive achievements and biological inspiration, these AI systems still differ significantly from human intelligence. In order to create truly human-like learning and thinking machines, it is necessary to go beyond current engineering trends in both what they learn and how they learn it. To achieve this goal, the authors propose several key principles that should guide the development of these machines. Firstly, they argue that these machines should be able to build causal models of the world that support explanation and understanding rather than just solving pattern recognition problems. This means going beyond recognizing patterns and instead focusing on understanding the underlying causes and mechanisms behind them. Secondly, the authors suggest grounding learning in intuitive theories of physics and psychology. By incorporating knowledge from these domains into the learning process, machines can acquire a richer understanding of the world and enhance their overall knowledge base. Lastly, the authors emphasize the importance of harnessing compositionality and learning-to-learn techniques to enable rapid acquisition and generalization of knowledge to new tasks and situations. By leveraging these abilities, machines can quickly adapt to new challenges without requiring extensive retraining or explicit programming. The authors conclude by highlighting concrete challenges and promising routes towards achieving these goals. They propose combining recent advances in neural network technology with more structured cognitive models to leverage the strengths of both approaches. In summary, recent advancements in AI have demonstrated impressive performance in tasks such as object recognition and game playing. However, creating truly human-like learning and thinking machines requires going beyond current engineering trends. By building causal models of the world, grounding learning in intuitive theories, harnessing compositionality and learning-to-learn techniques; machines can acquire a deeper understanding of the world and rapidly adapt to new challenges.
Created on 22 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.