Concrete Problems in AI Safety

AI-generated keywords: AI Safety Machine Learning Accident Risk Objective Function Research Directions

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors discuss potential impacts of rapid progress in machine learning and AI on society
  • Focus on the problem of accidents in machine learning systems
  • Comprehensive list of five practical research problems related to accident risk
  • Wrong objective function: "avoiding side effects" and "avoiding reward hacking"
  • Expensive objective function evaluation: "scalable supervision"
  • Undesirable behavior during learning process: "safe exploration" and "distributional shift"
  • Review previous work and propose research directions to address these challenges
  • Emphasize importance of considering safety when developing AI applications
  • Aim to enhance safety and reliability of AI systems as they advance
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, Dan Mané

29 pages

Abstract: Rapid progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) has brought increasing attention to the potential impacts of AI technologies on society. In this paper we discuss one such potential impact: the problem of accidents in machine learning systems, defined as unintended and harmful behavior that may emerge from poor design of real-world AI systems. We present a list of five practical research problems related to accident risk, categorized according to whether the problem originates from having the wrong objective function ("avoiding side effects" and "avoiding reward hacking"), an objective function that is too expensive to evaluate frequently ("scalable supervision"), or undesirable behavior during the learning process ("safe exploration" and "distributional shift"). We review previous work in these areas as well as suggesting research directions with a focus on relevance to cutting-edge AI systems. Finally, we consider the high-level question of how to think most productively about the safety of forward-looking applications of AI.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Jun. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1606.06565v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Concrete Problems in AI Safety," authors Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané discuss the potential impacts of rapid progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) on society. Specifically, they focus on the problem of accidents in machine learning systems. The authors present a comprehensive list of five practical research problems related to accident risk. These problems are categorized based on their origins: having the wrong objective function ("avoiding side effects" and "avoiding reward hacking"), an objective function that is too expensive to evaluate frequently ("scalable supervision"), or undesirable behavior during the learning process ("safe exploration" and "distributional shift"). To address these challenges, the authors review previous work in these areas and propose research directions that are relevant to cutting-edge AI systems. They emphasize the importance of considering safety when developing forward-looking applications of AI. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the potential risks associated with AI technologies and offers practical solutions for mitigating accidents in machine learning systems. The authors' research directions aim to enhance the safety and reliability of AI systems as they continue to advance.
Created on 12 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.