Star-forming Galaxies in Intermediate Redshift Clusters: Stellar vs. Dynamical Masses of Luminous Compact Blue Galaxies

AI-generated keywords: Luminous Compact Blue Galaxies (LCBGs) Stellar Mass Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) Models Dynamical Mass Star Formation Activity

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigates the stellar masses of Luminous Compact Blue Galaxies (LCBGs) in the distant cluster MS$~$0451.6-0305 at a redshift of approximately $z\approx0.54$
  • 16 spectroscopically-confirmed cluster LCBGs were analyzed using ground-based multicolor imaging and spectroscopy
  • Stellar masses were determined using spectral energy distribution (SED) models fitted to multiband photometry
  • Comparison was made between the stellar masses derived from SED models and dynamical masses obtained from emission-line spectra
  • Correlations were found between stellar age, extinction, and stellar mass derived from different SED models
  • Cluster LCBGs exhibit lower dynamical-to-stellar mass ratios compared to field LCBG counterparts
  • Specific star formation rate declines steeply with increasing mass among cluster LCBGs, suggesting vigorous star formation activity
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. M. Randriamampandry, S. M. Crawford, M. A. Bershady, G. D. Wirth, C. M. Cress

arXiv: 1706.04534v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
16 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS

Abstract: We investigate the stellar masses of the class of star-forming objects known as Luminous Compact Blue Galaxies (LCBGs) by studying a sample of galaxies in the distant cluster MS$~$0451.6-0305 at $z\approx0.54$ with ground-based multicolor imaging and spectroscopy. For a sample of 16 spectroscopically-confirmed cluster LCBGs (colour $B-V < 0.5$, surface brightness $\mu_B < 21$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$, and magnitude $M_B < -18.5$), we measure stellar masses by fitting spectral energy distribution (SED) models to multiband photometry, and compare with dynamical masses (determined from velocity dispersion between 10 $<$ $\sigma_v (\rm km~ s^{-1})$ $<$ 80), we previously obtained from their emission-line spectra. We compare two different stellar population models that measure stellar mass in star-bursting galaxies, indicating correlations between the stellar age, extinction, and stellar mass derived from the two different SED models. The stellar masses of cluster LCBGs are distributed similarly to those of field LCBGs, but the cluster LCBGs show lower dynamical-to-stellar mass ratios ($\rm M_{dyn}/M_{\ast} = 2.6$) than their field LCBG counterparts ($\rm M_{dyn}/M_{\ast}=4.8$), echoing trends noted previously in low-redshift dwarf elliptical galaxies. Within this limited sample, the specific star formation rate declines steeply with increasing mass, suggesting that these cluster LCBGs have undergone vigorous star formation.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jun. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1706.04534v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In this study, the authors investigate the stellar masses of a specific class of star-forming objects called Luminous Compact Blue Galaxies (LCBGs). They focus on a sample of galaxies in the distant cluster MS$~$0451.6-0305 at a redshift of approximately $z\approx0.54$. The researchers utilize ground-based multicolor imaging and spectroscopy to analyze 16 spectroscopically-confirmed cluster LCBGs that meet certain criteria, including color ($B-V < 0.5$), surface brightness ($\mu_B < 21$ mag arcsec$^{-2}$), and magnitude ($M_B < -18.5$). To determine the stellar masses of these LCBGs, they employ spectral energy distribution (SED) models fitted to multiband photometry. They compare these measurements with dynamical masses previously obtained from emission-line spectra, which were determined based on velocity dispersion between 10 $< \sigma_v (\rm km~ s^{-1}) < 80$. The study compares two different stellar population models that estimate stellar mass in starbursting galaxies. The results reveal correlations between the stellar age, extinction, and stellar mass derived from these two distinct SED models. The analysis shows that the stellar masses of cluster LCBGs are distributed similarly to those of field LCBGs. However, there is an interesting difference: the cluster LCBGs exhibit lower dynamical-to-stellar mass ratios ($\rm M_{dyn}/M_{\ast} = 2.6$) compared to their field LCBG counterparts ($\rm M_{dyn}/M_{\ast}=4.8$). This finding echoes trends observed in low-redshift dwarf elliptical galaxies. Moreover, within this limited sample it is noted that the specific star formation rate declines steeply with increasing mass among the cluster LCBGs; suggesting that these galaxies have undergone vigorous star formation activity. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the stellar masses of LCBGs in intermediate redshift clusters and contributes to our understanding of the relationship between stellar mass, dynamical mass and star formation activity in these galaxies.
Created on 30 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.