Detection and segmentation of the Left Ventricle in Cardiac MRI using Deep Learning

AI-generated keywords: Automated Segmentation Deep Learning Cardiac Diagnostics Left Ventricle MRI

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Manual segmentation of the Left Ventricle (LV) in cardiac diagnostics is a laborious and meticulous task
  • Automation of this process is needed to improve accuracy and efficiency
  • Avendi et al. proposed using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Stacked Auto-Encoders, and Deformable Models for automated segmentation
  • Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of their proposed method
  • Results showed that deep learning techniques can achieve more accurate segmentations compared to manual delineation by experts
  • Avendi et al.'s approach allows for experimentation with different variations, leading to potential advancements in automated LV segmentation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Alexandre Attia, Sharone Dayan

Abstract: Manual segmentation of the Left Ventricle (LV) is a tedious and meticulous task that can vary depending on the patient, the Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) cuts and the experts. Still today, we consider manual delineation done by experts as being the ground truth for cardiac diagnosticians. Thus, we are reviewing the paper - written by Avendi and al. - who presents a combined approach with Convolutional Neural Networks, Stacked Auto-Encoders and Deformable Models, to try and automate the segmentation while performing more accurately. Furthermore, we have implemented parts of the paper (around three quarts) and experimented both the original method and slightly modified versions when changing the architecture and the parameters.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Jan. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1801.02171v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of cardiac diagnostics, manual segmentation of the Left Ventricle (LV) is a laborious and meticulous task that can vary depending on factors such as the patient, Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) cuts, and the expertise of the individuals involved. Currently, manual delineation performed by experts is considered to be the ground truth for cardiac diagnosticians. However, there is a need to automate this process in order to improve accuracy and efficiency. To address this challenge, Avendi et al. proposed utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Stacked Auto-Encoders, and Deformable Models to automate the segmentation process while achieving higher levels of accuracy. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of their proposed method, parts of Avendi et al. 's paper were implemented and experiments were conducted. Both the original method described in the paper and slightly modified versions with changes made to the architecture and parameters were tested. The results obtained from these experiments provide valuable insights into the potential of deep learning techniques for automating LV segmentation in cardiac MRI. By combining CNNs, Stacked Auto-Encoders, and Deformable Models it is possible to achieve more accurate segmentations compared to manual delineation by experts. This refined summary highlights not only the challenges associated with manual LV segmentation but also introduces Avendi et al. 's innovative approach using deep learning techniques which emphasizes how implementing parts of their proposed method allowed for experimentation with different variations leading to improved understanding and potential advancements in automated LV segmentation.
Created on 27 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.