Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Models

AI-generated keywords: Bias Machine Learning Equalizer Model Image Captioning Gender

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address biases in machine learning methods, specifically in image captioning models
  • Image captioning models tend to amplify biases present in training data
  • Proposed model called the Equalizer model ensures equal gender probability when gender evidence is occluded and provides confident predictions when evidence is present
  • Model focuses on looking at a person rather than relying solely on contextual cues for gender-specific predictions
  • Incorporates two losses: Appearance Confusion Loss and Confident Loss to mitigate bias in description dataset
  • Outperforms prior work in describing images with people and mentioning their gender
  • Matches ground truth ratio of sentences including women to sentences including men closely
  • Model more frequently looks at people when predicting their gender, relying less on contextual cues
  • Offers an effective approach for generating gender-specific caption words based on appearance or image context
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Kaylee Burns, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Trevor Darrell, Anna Rohrbach

22 pages; 6 figures; Burns and Hendricks contributed equally

Abstract: Most machine learning methods are known to capture and exploit biases of the training data. While some biases are beneficial for learning, others are harmful. Specifically, image captioning models tend to exaggerate biases present in training data (e.g., if a word is present in 60% of training sentences, it might be predicted in 70% of sentences at test time). This can lead to incorrect captions in domains where unbiased captions are desired, or required, due to over-reliance on the learned prior and image context. In this work we investigate generation of gender-specific caption words (e.g. man, woman) based on the person's appearance or the image context. We introduce a new Equalizer model that ensures equal gender probability when gender evidence is occluded in a scene and confident predictions when gender evidence is present. The resulting model is forced to look at a person rather than use contextual cues to make a gender-specific predictions. The losses that comprise our model, the Appearance Confusion Loss and the Confident Loss, are general, and can be added to any description model in order to mitigate impacts of unwanted bias in a description dataset. Our proposed model has lower error than prior work when describing images with people and mentioning their gender and more closely matches the ground truth ratio of sentences including women to sentences including men. We also show that unlike other approaches, our model is indeed more often looking at people when predicting their gender.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Mar. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1803.09797v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Women also Snowboard: Overcoming Bias in Captioning Models," authors Kaylee Burns, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Trevor Darrell, and Anna Rohrbach address the issue of biases in machine learning methods, particularly in image captioning models. While some biases can be beneficial for learning, others can be harmful. The authors highlight that image captioning models tend to amplify biases present in the training data, leading to incorrect captions in domains where unbiased captions are desired. To tackle this problem, the authors propose a new model called the Equalizer model. This model ensures equal gender probability when gender evidence is occluded in a scene and provides confident predictions when gender evidence is present. By doing so, the model focuses on looking at a person rather than relying solely on contextual cues to make gender-specific predictions. The proposed model incorporates two losses: the Appearance Confusion Loss and the Confident Loss. These losses can be added to any description model to mitigate unwanted bias in a description dataset. The authors demonstrate that their model outperforms prior work when describing images with people and mentioning their gender. It also closely matches the ground truth ratio of sentences including women to sentences including men. Furthermore, unlike other approaches, the authors show that their model more frequently looks at people when predicting their gender. This indicates that it relies less on contextual cues and instead focuses on visual evidence from individuals. Overall, this research contributes to addressing biases in machine learning models by proposing an effective approach for generating gender-specific caption words based on appearance or image context. The proposed Equalizer model offers a promising solution for achieving unbiased image captions and improving accuracy in describing images with people while considering their gender.
Created on 19 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.