Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks

AI-generated keywords: Artificial intelligence deep learning relational inductive biases graph networks structured representations

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Significant progress in various domains of artificial intelligence (AI) such as vision, language processing, control systems, and decision-making
  • Current AI approaches struggle to replicate key aspects of human intelligence, particularly the ability to generalize beyond one's experiences
  • Authors advocate for prioritizing combinatorial generalization and leveraging structured representations and computations in AI
  • Proposal to incorporate relational inductive biases into deep learning architectures through graph networks to enable machines to learn about entities, relations between them, and rules for composing these elements
  • Graph networks extend neural network approaches operating on graphs and provide a simple interface for manipulating structured knowledge and generating structured behaviors
  • The incorporation of structured representations into AI models can bridge the gap between current machine capabilities and human-like intelligence, enabling more sophisticated patterns of reasoning that are interpretable and flexible
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Peter W. Battaglia, Jessica B. Hamrick, Victor Bapst, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Vinicius Zambaldi, Mateusz Malinowski, Andrea Tacchetti, David Raposo, Adam Santoro, Ryan Faulkner, Caglar Gulcehre, Francis Song, Andrew Ballard, Justin Gilmer, George Dahl, Ashish Vaswani, Kelsey Allen, Charles Nash, Victoria Langston, Chris Dyer, Nicolas Heess, Daan Wierstra, Pushmeet Kohli, Matt Botvinick, Oriol Vinyals, Yujia Li, Razvan Pascanu

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) has undergone a renaissance recently, making major progress in key domains such as vision, language, control, and decision-making. This has been due, in part, to cheap data and cheap compute resources, which have fit the natural strengths of deep learning. However, many defining characteristics of human intelligence, which developed under much different pressures, remain out of reach for current approaches. In particular, generalizing beyond one's experiences--a hallmark of human intelligence from infancy--remains a formidable challenge for modern AI. The following is part position paper, part review, and part unification. We argue that combinatorial generalization must be a top priority for AI to achieve human-like abilities, and that structured representations and computations are key to realizing this objective. Just as biology uses nature and nurture cooperatively, we reject the false choice between "hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning, and instead advocate for an approach which benefits from their complementary strengths. We explore how using relational inductive biases within deep learning architectures can facilitate learning about entities, relations, and rules for composing them. We present a new building block for the AI toolkit with a strong relational inductive bias--the graph network--which generalizes and extends various approaches for neural networks that operate on graphs, and provides a straightforward interface for manipulating structured knowledge and producing structured behaviors. We discuss how graph networks can support relational reasoning and combinatorial generalization, laying the foundation for more sophisticated, interpretable, and flexible patterns of reasoning. As a companion to this paper, we have released an open-source software library for building graph networks, with demonstrations of how to use them in practice.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Jun. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1806.01261v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Artificial Intelligence: Advancements and Challenges The field of artificial intelligence (AI) has seen significant progress in various domains such as vision, language processing, control systems, and decision-making. This is largely due to the availability of cheap data and computing resources that align well with the strengths of deep learning. However, despite these achievements, current AI approaches still struggle to replicate many key aspects of human intelligence that have evolved under different pressures. One major challenge is the ability to generalize beyond one's experiences - a skill that is fundamental to human intelligence from infancy. In their paper titled "Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks," authors Peter W. Battaglia and colleagues argue that achieving human-like abilities in AI requires prioritizing combinatorial generalization and leveraging structured representations and computations. They advocate for an approach that combines the strengths of "hand-engineering" and "end-to-end" learning rather than viewing them as mutually exclusive options. The authors propose incorporating relational inductive biases into deep learning architectures to enable machines to learn about entities, relations between them, and rules for composing these elements. To support this idea further, they introduce a new building block for AI systems called graph networks which have a strong relational inductive bias. Graph networks extend existing neural network approaches operating on graphs and provide a simple interface for manipulating structured knowledge and generating structured behaviors. By utilizing graph networks, the authors lay the groundwork for more sophisticated patterns of reasoning that are interpretable and flexible within AI systems. This not only bridges the gap between current machine capabilities and human-like intelligence but also allows for more practical applications. To facilitate further research in this area, the authors have released an open-source software library for building graph networks along with practical demonstrations on how to implement them effectively. This will encourage other researchers to explore the potential of incorporating structured representations into AI models. Overall, the work of Battaglia and colleagues highlights the importance of incorporating structured representations into AI models to achieve more sophisticated patterns of reasoning that are interpretable, flexible, and bridge the gap between current machine capabilities and human-like intelligence.
Created on 04 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.