Disruption of satellite galaxies in simulated groups and clusters: the roles of accretion time, baryons, and pre-processing
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Study investigates disruption of satellite galaxies in groups and clusters with total mass above 10^10 M_sun
- Utilizes Hydrangea simulations, consisting of 24 high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamical zoom-in simulations based on EAGLE model
- Approximately 50% of satellite galaxies survive until redshift z = 0
- Higher survival fractions observed in massive clusters compared to groups, with minor differences between baryonic and pure N-body simulations
- Majority (up to 90%) of galaxy disruption occurs within lower-mass sub-groups during pre-processing
- Satellites in massive clusters accreted at z < 2 and not undergone pre-processing have a survival rate of 96%
- Only a small percentage of disrupted satellites merge with other satellites even in low-mass groups
- Survival fraction changes rapidly from less than 10% for those accreted at high z to over 90% at low z, more pronounced for more massive galaxies and those accreted onto less massive haloes
- Weak correlations found between satellite disruption and pre-accretion baryon content, star formation rate, and size
- Satellite disruption primarily driven by gravitational processes rather than baryonic effects
Authors: Yannick M. Bahé, Joop Schaye, David J. Barnes, Claudio Dalla Vecchia, Scott T. Kay, Richard G. Bower, Henk Hoekstra, Sean L. McGee, Tom Theuns
Abstract: We investigate the disruption of group and cluster satellite galaxies with total mass (dark matter plus baryons) above 10^10 M_sun in the Hydrangea simulations, a suite of 24 high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamical zoom-in simulations based on the EAGLE model. The simulations predict that ~50 per cent of satellites survive to redshift z = 0, with higher survival fractions in massive clusters than in groups and only small differences between baryonic and pure N-body simulations. For clusters, up to 90 per cent of galaxy disruption occurs in lower-mass sub-groups (i.e., during pre-processing); 96 per cent of satellites in massive clusters that were accreted at z < 2 and have not been pre-processed survive. Of those satellites that are disrupted, only a few per cent merge with other satellites, even in low-mass groups. The survival fraction changes rapidly from less than 10 per cent of those accreted at high z to more than 90 per cent at low z. This shift, which reflects faster disruption of satellites accreted at higher z, happens at lower z for more massive galaxies and those accreted onto less massive haloes. The disruption of satellite galaxies is found to correlate only weakly with their pre-accretion baryon content, star formation rate, and size, so that surviving galaxies are nearly unbiased in these properties. These results suggest that satellite disruption in massive haloes is uncommon, and that it is predominantly the result of gravitational rather than baryonic processes.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.