Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model

AI-generated keywords: Market Making High-Frequency Trading Limit Order Book Optimal Switching Impulse Control

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Market-making model tailored for high-frequency trading under a limit order book (LOB)
  • Flexible framework allowing for arbitrary order volume, price jump, and bid-ask spread distributions
  • Ability to honor consistency of price movements upon arrivals of different order types
  • Respects the price-time priority of LOB for fair and efficient trading
  • Leverages optimal switching and impulse control techniques on marked point processes
  • Uses Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJBQVI) methods to solve the associated control problem
  • Provides full numerical analysis calibrated to the order-book statistics of a popular ETF
  • Demonstrates that profits from market-making can be overstated when dealing with LOBs exhibiting inconsistent price movements
  • Innovative market-making model designed for high-frequency trading under LOBs
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Baron Law, Frederi Viens

arXiv: 1903.07222v4 - DOI (q-fin.TR)

Abstract: We develop a new market-making model, from the ground up, which is tailored towards high-frequency trading under a limit order book (LOB), based on the well-known classification of order types in market microstructure. Our flexible framework allows arbitrary order volume, price jump, and bid-ask spread distributions as well as the use of market orders. It also honors the consistency of price movements upon arrivals of different order types. For example, it is apparent that prices should never go down on buy market orders. In addition, it respects the price-time priority of LOB. In contrast to the approach of regular control on diffusion as in the classical Avellaneda and Stoikov [1] market-making framework, we exploit the techniques of optimal switching and impulse control on marked point processes, which have proven to be very effective in modeling the order-book features. The Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJBQVI) associated with the control problem can be solved numerically via finite-difference method. We illustrate our optimal trading strategy with a full numerical analysis, calibrated to the order-book statistics of a popular Exchanged-Traded Fund (ETF). Our simulation shows that the profit of market-making can be severely overstated under LOBs with inconsistent price movements.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Mar. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1903.07222v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model," authors Baron Law and Frederi Viens present a new market-making model tailored for high-frequency trading under a limit order book (LOB). The model is based on the well-known classification of order types in market microstructure and offers a flexible framework that allows for arbitrary order volume, price jump, and bid-ask spread distributions, as well as the use of market orders. One key aspect of the proposed model is its ability to honor the consistency of price movements upon arrivals of different order types. For instance, it ensures that prices never go down on buy market orders. Additionally, the model respects the price-time priority of LOB, which is crucial in maintaining fair and efficient trading. Unlike traditional approaches that rely on regular control on diffusion, such as the Avellaneda and Stoikov market-making framework, Law and Viens leverage optimal switching and impulse control techniques on marked point processes to effectively capture the features of an order book. These techniques have proven to be highly effective in modeling complex dynamics observed in real-world trading environments. To solve the associated control problem, the authors employ Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman quasi-variational inequality (HJBQVI) methods. This allows them to numerically determine optimal trading strategies using finite-difference methods. To illustrate their approach, Law and Viens provide a full numerical analysis calibrated to the order-book statistics of a popular Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF). Through simulations, they demonstrate that profits from market-making can be significantly overstated when dealing with LOBs that exhibit inconsistent price movements. Overall, this paper presents an innovative market-making model specifically designed for high-frequency trading under LOBs. By incorporating advanced techniques from optimal switching and impulse control theory, it offers insights into improving trading strategies while accounting for various order types and maintaining consistency in price movements.
Created on 06 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.