AI Meets Austen: Towards Human-Robot Discussions of Literary Metaphor

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Artificial intelligence is transforming formal education
  • Informal lifelong learning settings have been neglected in this field
  • Natalie Parde and Rodney D. Nielsen present a proof-of-concept for an embodied book discussion companion
  • The study involved 26 participants discussing Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice"
  • Each participant rated their interactions with the robot highly
  • Companion robots could serve as an entry point for promoting lifelong learning and cognitive exercise outside of formal educational settings
  • The authors' work has been accepted at the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Natalie Parde, Rodney D. Nielsen

Accepted to the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019)

Abstract: Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing formal education, fueled by innovations in learning assessment, content generation, and instructional delivery. Informal, lifelong learning settings have been the subject of less attention. We provide a proof-of-concept for an embodied book discussion companion, designed to stimulate conversations with readers about particularly creative metaphors in fiction literature. We collect ratings from 26 participants, each of whom discuss Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice" with the robot across one or more sessions, and find that participants rate their interactions highly. This suggests that companion robots could be an interesting entryway for the promotion of lifelong learning and cognitive exercise in future applications.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Apr. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1904.03713v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Artificial intelligence is transforming the landscape of formal education, with advancements in learning assessment, content generation, and instructional delivery. However, informal lifelong learning settings have been relatively neglected in this field. In an effort to address this gap, Natalie Parde and Rodney D. Nielsen present a proof-of-concept for an embodied book discussion companion that aims to stimulate conversations about creative metaphors in fiction literature. The study involved 26 participants who engaged with the robot across one or more sessions discussing Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," with each participant rating their interactions highly. This finding suggests that companion robots could serve as an interesting entry point for promoting lifelong learning and cognitive exercise in future applications beyond formal educational settings. The authors' work has been accepted at the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2019), indicating its potential significance in the field of AI-assisted education. This research highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to facilitate informal learning outside of traditional educational settings.
Created on 24 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.