Recent Advances in Neural Question Generation

AI-generated keywords: Neural Question Generation Natural Language Processing Corpora Methodologies Evaluation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Neural Question Generation (NQG) has been a subject of much research and development in recent years.
  • Integration of a wider variety of inputs has led to the generation of questions that require higher levels of cognition.
  • NQG is a bellwether for Natural Language Processing (NLP), highlighting how human intelligence embodies skills such as curiosity and integration.
  • Liangming Pan, Wenqiang Lei, Tat-Seng Chua, and Min-Yen Kan conducted a survey examining corpora, methodologies, and evaluation methods to provide a comprehensive overview of NQG.
  • Emerging trends in NQG's learning paradigms, input modalities, and cognitive levels considered by researchers are revealed in the survey.
  • Promising directions for future research include incorporating external knowledge sources into question generation models or developing more sophisticated evaluation metrics to assess the quality of generated questions.
  • This survey emphasizes the importance of NQG as an area of study within NLP and provides valuable insights into its current state and potential future developments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Liangming Pan, Wenqiang Lei, Tat-Seng Chua, Min-Yen Kan

Survey of neural question generation

Abstract: Emerging research in Neural Question Generation (NQG) has started to integrate a larger variety of inputs, and generating questions requiring higher levels of cognition. These trends point to NQG as a bellwether for NLP, about how human intelligence embodies the skills of curiosity and integration. We present a comprehensive survey of neural question generation, examining the corpora, methodologies, and evaluation methods. From this, we elaborate on what we see as emerging on NQG's trend: in terms of the learning paradigms, input modalities, and cognitive levels considered by NQG. We end by pointing out the potential directions ahead.

Submitted to arXiv on 22 May. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1905.08949v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In recent years, Neural Question Generation (NQG) has been the subject of much research and development. One notable trend in this field is the integration of a wider variety of inputs, which has led to the generation of questions that require higher levels of cognition. This development has positioned NQG as a bellwether for Natural Language Processing (NLP), highlighting how human intelligence embodies skills such as curiosity and integration. To provide a comprehensive overview of NQG, Liangming Pan, Wenqiang Lei, Tat-Seng Chua, and Min-Yen Kan have conducted a survey examining corpora, methodologies, and evaluation methods. Their findings reveal emerging trends in NQG's learning paradigms, input modalities, and cognitive levels considered by researchers. The authors note that there are several promising directions for future research in this area. For instance, they suggest exploring how to incorporate external knowledge sources into question generation models or developing more sophisticated evaluation metrics to assess the quality of generated questions. Overall, this survey emphasizes the importance of NQG as an area of study within NLP and provides valuable insights into its current state and potential future developments.
Created on 17 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.