Gated Group Self-Attention for Answer Selection
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Answer selection is crucial in various question answering (QA) applications
- Deep models have achieved state-of-the-art performance in answer selection
- Recurrent neural network (RNN) based models struggle to capture long-range dependencies between words in sentences
- Gated group self-attention (GGSA) is a new deep model proposed for answer selection
- GGSA is inspired by global self-attention, originally developed for machine translation and not explored in answer selection before
- GGSA overcomes the problem of global self-attention where local and global information cannot be well distinguished
- An interaction mechanism between questions and answers is proposed to enhance GGSA using a residual structure
- Experimental results on two popular QA datasets demonstrate that GGSA outperforms existing answer selection models to achieve state-of-the-art performance with lower computation cost than global self-attention.
- The paper's authors are Dong Xu, Jianhui Ji, Haikuan Huang, Hongbo Deng, and Wu-Jun Li.
Authors: Dong Xu, Jianhui Ji, Haikuan Huang, Hongbo Deng, Wu-Jun Li
Abstract: Answer selection (answer ranking) is one of the key steps in many kinds of question answering (QA) applications, where deep models have achieved state-of-the-art performance. Among these deep models, recurrent neural network (RNN) based models are most popular, typically with better performance than convolutional neural network (CNN) based models. Nevertheless, it is difficult for RNN based models to capture the information about long-range dependency among words in the sentences of questions and answers. In this paper, we propose a new deep model, called gated group self-attention (GGSA), for answer selection. GGSA is inspired by global self-attention which is originally proposed for machine translation and has not been explored in answer selection. GGSA tackles the problem of global self-attention that local and global information cannot be well distinguished. Furthermore, an interaction mechanism between questions and answers is also proposed to enhance GGSA by a residual structure. Experimental results on two popular QA datasets show that GGSA can outperform existing answer selection models to achieve state-of-the-art performance. Furthermore, GGSA can also achieve higher accuracy than global self-attention for the answer selection task, with a lower computation cost.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.