GNN-RAG: Graph Neural Retrieval for Large Language Model Reasoning

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) are state-of-the-art models in Natural Language Processing (NLP) due to their ability to understand natural language but struggle with adapting to new or domain-specific information.
  • Knowledge Graphs (KGs) store structured factual knowledge in triplets, capturing complex relationships between entities.
  • Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are effective for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs (KGQA) tasks due to their ability to handle intricate graph structures.
  • GNN-RAG combines LLMs' language understanding capabilities with GNNs' reasoning abilities in a retrieval-augmented generation style for KGQA tasks.
  • GNN-RAG uses a GNN to reason over a dense subgraph of the KG, retrieves answer candidates, and utilizes shortest paths connecting question entities and answer candidates for reasoning within the graph.
  • The framework leverages both GNNs and LLMs effectively, achieving state-of-the-art performance on popular KGQA benchmarks like WebQSP and CWQ, particularly excelling on multi-hop and multi-entity questions.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Costas Mavromatis, George Karypis

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) represent human-crafted factual knowledge in the form of triplets (head, relation, tail), which collectively form a graph. Question Answering over KGs (KGQA) is the task of answering natural questions grounding the reasoning to the information provided by the KG. Large Language Models (LLMs) are the state-of-the-art models for QA tasks due to their remarkable ability to understand natural language. On the other hand, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for KGQA as they can handle the complex graph information stored in the KG. In this work, we introduce GNN-RAG, a novel method for combining language understanding abilities of LLMs with the reasoning abilities of GNNs in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) style. First, a GNN reasons over a dense KG subgraph to retrieve answer candidates for a given question. Second, the shortest paths in the KG that connect question entities and answer candidates are extracted to represent KG reasoning paths. The extracted paths are verbalized and given as input for LLM reasoning with RAG. In our GNN-RAG framework, the GNN acts as a dense subgraph reasoner to extract useful graph information, while the LLM leverages its natural language processing ability for ultimate KGQA. Furthermore, we develop a retrieval augmentation (RA) technique to further boost KGQA performance with GNN-RAG. Experimental results show that GNN-RAG achieves state-of-the-art performance in two widely used KGQA benchmarks (WebQSP and CWQ), outperforming or matching GPT-4 performance with a 7B tuned LLM. In addition, GNN-RAG excels on multi-hop and multi-entity questions outperforming competing approaches by 8.9--15.5% points at answer F1.

Submitted to arXiv on 30 May. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.20139v1

, , , , In the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as state-of-the-art models due to their exceptional ability to understand natural language. These models are trained on vast amounts of textual data to acquire general human knowledge, but they struggle with adapting to new or domain-specific information and are prone to generating incorrect information. On the other hand, Knowledge Graphs (KGs) store structured factual knowledge in the form of triplets, forming a graph that captures complex relationships between entities. Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs (KGQA) involves answering questions by leveraging the information stored in KGs. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for KGQA tasks because they can effectively handle the intricate graph structures present in KGs. In this study, a novel approach called GNN-RAG is introduced, which combines the language understanding capabilities of LLMs with the reasoning abilities of GNNs in a retrieval-augmented generation style. The GNN-RAG method first uses a GNN to reason over a dense subgraph of the KG and retrieve potential answer candidates for a given question. It then extracts shortest paths in the KG connecting question entities and answer candidates to represent reasoning paths within the graph. These paths are verbalized and fed into an LLM for further reasoning using retrieval-augmented generation techniques. The framework leverages the strengths of both GNNs and LLMs: GNN acts as a dense subgraph reasoner to extract valuable graph information, while LLM utilizes its natural language processing capabilities for effective KGQA. Additionally, a retrieval augmentation technique is developed to enhance performance further. Experimental results demonstrate that GNN-RAG achieves state-of-the-art performance on popular KGQA benchmarks such as WebQSP and CWQ, outperforming or matching even advanced models like GPT-4 when fine-tuned with 7B parameters. Notably, GNN-RAG excels particularly on multi-hop and multi-entity questions, surpassing existing approaches by significant margins at answer F1 scores. Overall, this study presents a comprehensive approach that effectively combines graph neural networks with large language models for improved Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs, showcasing superior performance on challenging QA tasks involving complex graph structures and multiple entities.
Created on 11 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.