Experiential AI
Authors: Drew Hemment, Ruth Aylett, Vaishak Belle, Dave Murray-Rust, Ewa Luger, Jane Hillston, Michael Rovatsos, Frank Broz
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Experiential AI is a new research agenda proposed by artists and scientists
- The goal is to make algorithms more transparent and foster collaboration between humans and machines in the field of artificial intelligence
- Art can serve as a mediator between computer code and human comprehension, enabling us to overcome the limitations of explanations for AI systems
- Artists can offer novel ways to make the reasoning of AI systems transparent and decipherable by making their boundaries visible
- Artistic practice can explore new configurations of humans and algorithms, helping us understand complex causal chains in environments with AI components
- Experiential AI has potential for interdisciplinary collaboration between artists and scientists while providing valuable insights into designing ethical AI systems that are better aligned with human values
- Experiential AI could play an important role in shaping the future development of artificial intelligence technologies.
Abstract: Experiential AI is proposed as a new research agenda in which artists and scientists come together to dispel the mystery of algorithms and make their mechanisms vividly apparent. It addresses the challenge of finding novel ways of opening up the field of artificial intelligence to greater transparency and collaboration between human and machine. The hypothesis is that art can mediate between computer code and human comprehension to overcome the limitations of explanations in and for AI systems. Artists can make the boundaries of systems visible and offer novel ways to make the reasoning of AI transparent and decipherable. Beyond this, artistic practice can explore new configurations of humans and algorithms, mapping the terrain of inter-agencies between people and machines. This helps to viscerally understand the complex causal chains in environments with AI components, including questions about what data to collect or who to collect it about, how the algorithms are chosen, commissioned and configured or how humans are conditioned by their participation in algorithmic processes.
Tools for this paper
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm compares the title and abstract of this paper with all the papers of the same arXiv category that we have summarized, and finds the closest ones. You can rerun it from time to time: the results improve as our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.