TwistBytes -- Hierarchical Classification at GermEval 2019: walking the fine line (of recall and precision)
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors achieved first place in hierarchical subtask B and second place in root node, flat classification subtask A
- Simple multi-feature TF-IDF extraction method used for subtask A
- Stopword removal and different n-gram ranges applied on each feature extraction module
- Standard linear SVM classifier used
- Local approach employed to tackle hierarchical classification
- Post-processing techniques used to handle multi-label aspect of the task and increase recall without compromising precision
- Results demonstrate effectiveness of the approach in accurately classifying German blurbs hierarchically while maintaining balance between recall and precision measures
- Paper provides insights into effective approach for hierarchical classification tasks, specifically focusing on German blurbs
Authors: Fernando Benites
Abstract: We present here our approach to the GermEval 2019 Task 1 - Shared Task on hierarchical classification of German blurbs. We achieved first place in the hierarchical subtask B and second place on the root node, flat classification subtask A. In subtask A, we applied a simple multi-feature TF-IDF extraction method using different n-gram range and stopword removal, on each feature extraction module. The classifier on top was a standard linear SVM. For the hierarchical classification, we used a local approach, which was more light-weighted but was similar to the one used in subtask A. The key point of our approach was the application of a post-processing to cope with the multi-label aspect of the task, increasing the recall but not surpassing the precision measure score.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.